ground

Jup plenty time, good luck

did you try raising PCIe frequency for more BCLK? 221 lines up with the pcie at 100 wall... You can estimate the required PCIE with ~targetBCLK*0.452 (on asus with good chips typically the max postable is 261 and 118, at least with 32nm (45nm can post higher PCIe for some reason). '10 32nm usully manages 225-255 BCLK on ambient, '11 chips can be more capable (max I've seen on ambient was 273 though I'm sure there are better ones out there). Haven't seen chips that were IMC limited at the 10x mem multi for 32nm yet.

100% Board limit no gain from -60 to -140 (no pll mod on this board)... Would‘ve probably managed the same score on dice with this chip and this board.

benching with Shaggy and Tagg :D Its good to have plenty of redundancy :D

G-die would be 1 or 2 GB sticks, so this gotta be D-die. Chip looks strong for SS!

windows time is 12:08 and 12:11 which does appear a little odd

I mean... they could be running with the pot just standing on the CPU (I've done that before binning) and since the runs are at basically at stock it doesn't seem impossible I guess. Just gonna try seeing a way its plausible. I'm 99% sure they'll rerun if enough people complain, its not like either score is particularly impressive. Edit: Also joining the complaining party since I wanna see runs that aren't basically stock...

comps usually require the mobo tab.

Indiana Yos on the hunt for the loophole

I mean for those there are at least IMCs that can use udimms as well as rdimms without any issue, sometimes even on the same boards (x99 especially). Pretty sure that doesn't apply to any platforms with FBdimms or do I remember it wrong?

All the 32Ms! Keep it up! :D

High QPI is just as good as more core clock Seems like you have found another stupid chip

Insane chip for dice :D Pretty sure there is more in it, we need to get this chip on LN2 some time ;)

Anyone here has experience getting hyper to run with 32nm 1156 chips? We have a couple 650s and 550s here that won't post with hyper at anything beyond 800 MHz if even that while handling PSC at >1050 or so... edit: and once again noting that almost nobody else running high QPI which makes it easy

Quick suggestion gauging interest - would it be more popular if its 2C/4T/8T instead of 4c8t for all 3 subs (which would be unavoidable otherwise)? Not sure how that would go for moderation though... Either way, I'm happy to see 1156

Please clarify for ddr3 - xeons are allowed if they are 6 Cores or less? Binning 1366 IMCs is gonna be close to impossible otherwise...

For memory frequency stages, do the used CPU or used memory have to be unique for submissions?

http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=22963 Was looking for something else but this some cold testing of GTX2 fits here

https://hwbot.org/competition/team_cup_2018_ddr4/stage/4372_geekbench3_-_multi_core_-_dual_cores_only

Needs more QPI and memory frequency :D

LOL that would be stupid but I would be all up in arms for that or better - Am3+ 4 dimm, 1156 4 dimm and 1366 6 dimm max mem freq?

Nope there are a couple ddr3 boards. @mickulty I mean I would be all up for that, but also for 1156 anything (hasn’t been in TC since at least 2014 if not longer) or memory frequency. Right now 1156 is irrelevant besides dogpile stage but even then little point running that cold...

Would‘ve loved a DDR+DDR2+DDR3+DDR4 max mem freq stage with some platforms blocked out, but as is nothing besides some of the dogpile stages are interesting to me

Don't trust the PCB information in the SPD, they are wrong a lot of the time. Rather peak under the heatspreader to confirm the IC layout. Alternatively you can check with this.

Hypers sold. Random Elpida still available. Open to offers.