FireKillerGR

not bad

It is what it is ???

Thanks ?

Thanks. - combo of both

totally agree; feels like cinebench at this point. Only difference is that it requires a couple GPUs lol

nice one Nacho!

thanks @luumi 1ms = bios hax being op

I got to say that the memory clocks give a fair advantage. Will run wazza and rebench ?

This is under NDA afaik. You can try reaching out to Galax/Galax OC Lab in order to get access

Best way to start submitting for 2020 ?

Yy some quick 2D haha @MR-B no need for 06 just yet

Lol

uh lala. op!

thanks guys ^_^ @chispy about 2-2.5L all together

yes but my take was more of aiming to have heavier tests (in general) whenever we add something new from now on. Super 1080p does ok at the moment but afraid it might turn into 3D11, 3DV etc that are heavily bottlenecked by the cpu even on their respective graphic tests. Even TS has started showing this with dual gpu setups which will potentially turn into a single gpu issue as well in a couple generations.

was thinking about a potential swap between super 1080p and tsx (re globals). Thats based on the fact that tsx is not maxed out (both gpu and cpu) yet so it would be more of a futureproof solution (?) to avoid having massive changes in an anual base.

Thanks guys! @unity different cpu. That one was a 5900

Niiice

OP!

thanks guys! also added the link from FM ^^

thanks!

01 getting globals while being "oldschool" is a bit meh imo since it will still scale with newer cpus running at higher freq. Wanna compensate hw (aka oldschool) guys for running it? Increase the hw point cap on 01. For globals, would like 03/05 instead (mostly 03 as it still kinda scales with gpu/clocks + more tuning vs 05) and maybe revisit it in the future if needed (?). Rest of them I think make sense except the stupid cat. Benchmark with probably 0 support from its author. Had issues for which I dont think I ever heard from them + we saw more buggy runs vs any other 3DMark (while 100x times less popular). Also cant comment on VRMark. Suggestion -> kill the cat and add FSU or TSX instead. TSX with the more demanding physics will be probably more futureproof (as an overall benchmark) than anything else from the list. 3D sucks for being more demanding than most if not all 2D benchmarks? Also what Tobias said re multi-GPU support vs all the sub-categories on the 2D side

Thanks guys! Cards arent maxed out yet

Thanks! ?

thanks guys!