FireKillerGR

thanks!

01 getting globals while being "oldschool" is a bit meh imo since it will still scale with newer cpus running at higher freq. Wanna compensate hw (aka oldschool) guys for running it? Increase the hw point cap on 01. For globals, would like 03/05 instead (mostly 03 as it still kinda scales with gpu/clocks + more tuning vs 05) and maybe revisit it in the future if needed (?). Rest of them I think make sense except the stupid cat. Benchmark with probably 0 support from its author. Had issues for which I dont think I ever heard from them + we saw more buggy runs vs any other 3DMark (while 100x times less popular). Also cant comment on VRMark. Suggestion -> kill the cat and add FSU or TSX instead. TSX with the more demanding physics will be probably more futureproof (as an overall benchmark) than anything else from the list. 3D sucks for being more demanding than most if not all 2D benchmarks? Also what Tobias said re multi-GPU support vs all the sub-categories on the 2D side

Thanks guys! Cards arent maxed out yet

Thanks! ?

thanks guys!

use thermspy instead; same thing pretty much and it also reads down to -42C on the die (similar to what precision does)

thanks guys :D 2.9+ next :)

Daaaang. OP ?

lmfao insane :D Really need a 5950 I guess lol

Thanks ?

Thanks guys!

Siiiick ?

yeap! thanks

thanks! ^^

Strong :3

Thanks guys! ^^

Epower here

good one! :D

Thanks guys! Card isnt fully tested yet; just thought to see how it clocks. No cb so far but need to try and get colder.

nice one :D Welcome to the 3G club!

thanks. yeap; grizzly extreme OP. ^^ One mount = one session.

Insane

Going strong!

Yas @Alby pls change before recal kills our points :"(

small premium like 30~% above random 2600k ebay price. A 5.75~G gets about 44-46 hwpoints; a 5.65 gets about 41-42.5, 5.55~ about 40.5 and so on. Not sure it makes sense to pay much more for such difference (if you dont care about points then just buy a random chip).