K404

Thanks Alex, so basically all we need to do is cut the OCP signal in half Bet a 3-phase PWM will LOVE that :D

Only 50%? I joined the 300% club the other day

I have a question about the OCP mod. On all the cards I have, the OCP component reads as either 20K or 28K depending on what "direction" I hook up the probes. Have my cards been given adjusted component values? If I attach a 50K in parallel, I get ~18K as the result, where does the "25K instellen" come from?

This. Completely.

Happy birthday PJ!

I have a load of expendable A-XP CPUs here. If someone would like to let me know what models to keep to one side and what steps to follow to replicate this, I can have a go

There is always something better coming, a meet this large will brilliant no matter when it is If there is so much interesting hardware, there will be more benching and less talking. My interest in this is definitely more to meet people

Yea, it's more of a guide to "PSUs that people were sponsored with or were REALLY happy about buying" (that's not a complaint. Xigmatek helped me with a 1200W and I thanked them in every result until they pulled out of Europe) example: Q2-Q3 2013... there was a drop in 500-850W units, but not enough increases in other size ranges to compensate

Please put a price to it.

(My idea didn't work, but I think I know what I need. I'll hit you up on Skype )

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough... do you need the entire code, or just the section that is visible in the box without me scrolling to the end?

What do you need in the screenshot? I had another idea last night and will try it this evening, it might help things further.

Been playing again. Would this be sufficient as verification? I have "had to" make a 0615 device ID correspond to a GTS150 when "normally" a 0615 is the ID for a GTS250. I do NOT like doing this, it is smoke and mirrors IMO but it's as close as I can get to """correct""" nVidiaInspector still won't report a GTS150, but I genuinely wouldn't be using it for G92, Rivatuner all the way

Been meaning to ask about this for a few days, thanks for the info!

I have to agree, there is NO point in talking about this card "Hey! Look at what you can't buy!"

For global #698, none

Would it help if you released multiple installs, tuned/tweaked for different OS or hardware?

So out of all those, it looks like you found 3 good ones. LOL I can't tell if this will motivate people or not :p That's still ~£475 of CPUs

WTFF??? Are all of those E2140??

It would have been really good if you'd credited the original sources. I can see me making myself at home here

Had one since.....early July? A large % of Part 4 was done with it

Thanks Alex It was fun playing with these cards

What if there was either a secondary ranking OR a change to the global ranking system where, globally, benchers were ranked as either 2D, 3D or mixed benchers? "World #x 2D bencher" etc There's a few possible ways to determine it: x% of a users top 15 global scores being 2D or 3D (as applicable) ALL of their top 15 global scores? x% of their global AND hardware scores .....100% of their global and hardware scores? (if someones entire global and hardware contribution is 2D or 3D, IMO, that deserves some mention) I imagine the HWB engine could be set up to automatically rank users depending on their submissions, they wouldn't have to make a decision to be a 2D or 3D bencher. I've been thinking about this for a while, the addition of new 2D points and the implications did focus my thinking a bit. Thoughts? __________________________ as a closely related idea (ie...not worth a new thread) Would it be possible to add options to sort the Hardware Masters League based on 2D or 3D contribution? Basically... like the "highest to lowest" option in an online shop price list What about further sorting, to show AMD/Intel and AMD/nVidia contributions?

Finally got it working..... on my SUPER stripped OS.... and I have no idea how

Same board and OS, changed the GPU. All of the below was done in one boot *Removed and reinstalled AM3 *open wrapper and click start: wrapper crashes *changed Run mode to Manual, Hide logo, OSD Stats and Hide reset error all set to False: AM3 runs, gives a score within AM3, wrapper crashes upon exit *Changed run mode back to Auto: AM3 runs, gives score within wrapper *Run mode back to Manual: AM3 runs, gives a score within AM3, wrapper crashes upon exit *Changed run mode back to Auto: AM3 runs, gives score within wrapper *set run mode back to "true" : AM3 runs, gives score within wrapper *Set OSD Stats back to "true": AM3 runs, gives score within wrapper *Set "Hide reset error" back to "true": AM3 runs, gives score within wrapper *thought "WTH?" *Removed and reinstalled wrapper *Pressed start, AM3 runs, gives score in wrapper *brain explodes