Noxinite

Strong clocks!

Yes, it's just always worth considering the implications of rule changes.

Looks like fun!

'Dat Win10 boost. XD

If we were to remove CPU-Z and replace it with Benchmate, how would that work when implementing it for XP/98 OSes or older HW?

Almost 6.5GHz, strong!

Nice to see cold mems! But err, maybe more preparation next time? :D (And run 32M).

Work harder. Edit: no drama therefore no congratulations.

If we're talking in technicalities then the score is legal for only this category that it was submitted to as their is no validation file from the Benchmate utility. And the rules do not state that you can't have other utilities running at the same time (e.g. Benchmate).

Sale on hold for now. Will necro this thread when I'm ready to sell more.

Ahem, no CPU-Z tabs and no Benchmate for Win10 benching.

Nice start!

Awesome!

Dual channel instead of quad channel? I wonder if the higher frequency outweighs the benefit of quad channel for SuperPi...

Lemme just repaste from the report: "Comparing the scores via the GB3 links, show this score is faster across most sub-tests. There is not one (or other) sub-test that is massively out of line." So it is unlikely to have bugged. It would have had to bugged the timer pretty crazily to get such a big boost. Edit: Although, I haven't looked at the other Intel GB4 scores, so maybe it is out of line.

What platform did you test the PSC on? Also, what voltage did it need for 2666C8 and what PCB is it please?

Awesome!

Old gen Ryzen is still scoring well I see!

Strong!

Strong clocks!

Bump. Added Crosshair IV Formula and Corsair 1800C7 2x1GB DDR3. Edit: Also, now open to worldwide selling for obvious reasons.

I saw this thread and realised I had an OEM stick of Kingston DDR lying around; turns out it's KVR266X64C25/256 and it's Winbond. XD

Damn nice chip!

Nice chip!

While we're on the topic, is there any risks of this happening with any of the other bundled benchmarks? Although, I would have thought that altering and redistributing another entities code probably should have been questioned at the starting point. But otherwise I agree with Leeghoofd's statement above.