websmile

Hi up for sale is my 6600K 1. Intel Corei5 6600K boxed Rarely used, I bought the cpu because I needed a short term replacement for my 6700K. It was only used for a few memory tests but does quite well, I was able to run cinebench 4,8Ghz 1,29v BIOS on Asus Maximus Hero and XTU around 1,33v at same frequency with 3866 mem tight . The cpu is neither delidded nor lapped, VID is 1,168v on my Hero and it comes with the original Intel box. Price: 265 Euros shipped worldwide Item is located in germany, shipping will be done with deutsche post with insurance and tracking. Payment with paypal or western union, buyer covers fees! Disclaimer: Private sale, no returns. I offer no warranty but the cou looks and works flawless and should be covered by manufacturer warranty

Yes, two kits, worst B-die ever, non could do 3733 12-12

Background is now online,thx Pieter. Have fun benching

Will send you a PM, it will accelerate my candy crush expereince

That´s a shame, good chip

IMC or compability, third option is mems cannot take the pressure and bandwidth that dual channel puts on top. But it can also be a weak channel on the board, have you tested both slots seperately?

Yes, it can happen on some kits but it can also happen that this kit does 1T on another board and IMC. Note that some kits that I saw did 1t after I had initial problems, but they needed much more volts than for 2T P.S. It hits performance, but iirc, it is maybe 1s for spi32m and they are still useful mems

No, the 4000 and 4133 dividers work - I ran 4000 1T with E-die, and higher, 32m on Hero. B-Die didn´t work. It seems all 4 Dimm boards have a hard time to handle 4000 divider with 8GB sticks even when the sticks are single sided

Noticed, as soon as background is online submissions will be enabled as well I think

This reminds me very much of your legendary mem pot - stylish

Awesome, Marc. If this works with your cascade next stop gold

Have you tried to downgrade the BIOS? Lately I had feedback that on some new unlock BIOS xp64 was no go for install, maybe it is te same for win7x64, we know that these are not officially supported. OS worked when installed already, the installation of the os itself failed

Sorry brother, this calls for a time ban - excessive speeding

I checked all and blocked some 2000s, interesting competition as usual @TASOS it will make no big difference if the score will re-appear, you are at 2nd tied with other team, then you might be 2nd alone, good you had a decent scores submitted already beforehand

This is no good, the result was already reported before you saw the wrong screen, and request comes after the competition is already over. The rules are clear that submissions on competitions can´t be edited anymore and further proof is not allowed, we only make excepetions at technical errors or bugs caused by database sometimes. I hate to say this, but the submission will have to be removed from the comp, you or staff can edit it but only for normal submission or ranking then - sorry, this is an essntial rule P.S. You can make an appeal to christian ney, maybe he approves that the sub counts, but I have no other choice, my friend

I checked the results, I saw videoproof also at extreme stage and tested myself. The hwbotprimes are possible and valid, it may be time to check and test Java again to find best version which gives big boost. Don´t forget that hwbotprime is based on software.

All results checked, sadly I had to remove one top bencher due to general rule 1,2 (no ES and unreleased hardware allowed for competition unless there is excepetion/allowance at rules) because a non released mainboard was used http://hwbot.org/article/general_rules Result might need recalculation, was a strong fight, I think we will get final confirmation soon

All checked, I think it will need recalculation but result looks OK - nice fight

All checked, final result should come soon - great work, had to remove very few results

I guess at least the hwbotprime issue should be cleared now I checked all stages, one result needs more proof (screenshot bugged bc of database). Final result should come soon, it was a good fight with top results

Good run

I will of course check these, on the volts GA often shows wrong iirc depending on which os and if ypu transferred - but I can assure you that I could beat most of this with 1 hour work at same frequency, on hwbotprime we have several big scores because people tested and have even videoproof, Geekbench is OS and memtweaking plus more tweaking etc. I have seen screens of 6700k that show 2,2vcore at xtu, so of course I will check all, and all four stages, but I think it is always a bit early to point the finger when results are not even pre checked

Database error at screenshot obviously, please provide a visible screenshot by editing or send me screenshot/add at comment

Each XTU sub that shows 4503,0 or less at cpuz and 4,50Ghz or less at XTU result is valid for the competition P.S. I looked at it and frequencys are OK

I will handle this the same, xtu is a bit complicated, XTU itself please 4,50Ghz, CPUZ max is 4503Mhz. XTU rounds the result, which means you have either 4,50 or 4,51, this is main point for the formulation