websmile

Is there any reason why the gpuz info shows 1080 ti data and device id?

It does work, you copy the link adress and put it in your browser - several people checked it already

Please add the correct picture before people report this agin sigh

The background is at post 7 of the thread

I see half a dozen of extreme results 1080 for 1030a with 2GB ram? So I think it should work, maybe casanova can tell who already ran it On the cpus, we have 5g limit and no restrictions

wow, this is enormous :-o

The link should work, as said you can copy the link adress and open it in your browser if it does not redirect you at first.

Haha, Albrecht collects Alu hats

OK, so you use a 6970 to sub both 50 and 70, and you claim air or water but do 1350 core, on other scores you hide device id and so on... This is not funny and I think OCN might love me as well because you will get a timeout for cheating...

Someone stole the background :-o Here is the official wallpaper https://www.dropbox.com/s/5d0ooupk17zmplw/Cheapazchips-s2-Wallpaper-v1.png?dl=0

Too slow, the i7 Kabylake 7700K result is faster. 7740X and 7700K are both Kabylake i7

Sold items have been shipped, thanks to the buyers Closed

http://hwbot.org/article/general_rules I post a link to the general rules here again - if you use newer sysinfo and latest benchmark version and have a link without time measurement error you can bench all futuremark benchmarks also with amd and haswell etc. The windows restrictions table tells it all, so this should answer the several questions about time spy and so on I get regularly P.S. Why should someone use an i9 for stage 1 when there are at least 10 subfamilies which have clearly faster cpus for 32m? Be happy don_dan saw this faster, I would have given you a much more "friednly" reply...

If we ban everyone who is tricked by cpuz or has a bugged run there would be no one left - sorry, but this is not the first time cpuz fails because a board / BIOS/ driver fails at submitting correct info

http://hwbot.org/article/general_rules Please read the general rules to avoid questions like this in the future again. You can use the drivers, and unlike fm we accept official and beta drivers of all kind that directly offered by amd or nvidia, so there is no problem to use these and when fm shows driver is not supported hwbot doesnt care

Try to make a new post with the picture, it seems nothing works anymore at the forums...

Official drivers are never a problem, and general rules clearly say this. The issue of unsupported drivers especially on amd was discussed a lot of times

To kill your pattern, my 3866 TrodentZ RGB had same layout and could do 4133 12-11 gb/xtu for me on mocf and on a very fast test bootet and ran 4000 12-11 waza on an outdated impact8 with kbl

The cpu is sealed, glued back on with black silicone, it was used for daily. I can ship it via letter signed for 55 Euros combined

4130 is the linked cpu, the bclk should do better on Asus board (board limit on asrock is lower). On the Impact VI, I am not sure it makes sense to sell it so I withdraw it from sale

Final bump

You can try cas15 twcl 16/11/9 and maybe trdwr 15, but this is only based on Z170, on Z370 I only have a two dimm board which makes 4x tests obsolete^^

Reapers are sold and payment received, thanks

Vary twcl and also check the four trdwr values, they are sometimes set weird since skylake days and kill certain cas values especially on asus at full slots