As it had been discussed before - you don't have reliable way of verifying the results. You have to rely on existing results and a common sense what is possible and what not. But that's not reliable enough.

Because of this, asking for rankings is pointless, I think, although I'd love to play too.

Involving points would make it appealing for cheaters.

I'm speaking more generally..about all 32M low-clock challenges, not just Haswell-E. Heck, I don't even have the platform.

Edited August 21, 20159 yr by I.nfraR.ed

So...create a wrapper

But then all current results are invalid and scores will likely be slower as well.

Who cares???

Gpupi gave points within one month...same for geekbench and so on...let the wrapper work as a beta for 3 month...many will use that one in other forums as well!

Then launch it and we all have fun with doing a real mem benchmark!

Do we have any real mem benchmark? No....not in my opinion...

Geekbench is a pretty good memory benchmark but you're right... for the most part this isolates the CPU and makes it just a memory and tweaking benchmark.

Should we create a separate thread, cause I think this worth for each kind of cpu

Updated OP.

 

Just FYI, I'm only updating the thread if there's a post since my last post

Updated OP

So decided to test out some B-Die on X99 since I haven't done it.

 

4G

 

5G

 

Corsair Elite B-Die @ X99M Killer 3.1

same here ,only two modules

4G

coolhandluke41`s SuperPi - 32M score: 7min 21sec 250ms with a Core i7 5820K

Edited August 29, 20168 yr by coolhand411

Updated opening post

6 min 14 sec 369 ms

 

SAMBA`s SuperPi - 32M score: 6min 14sec 369ms with a Core i7 5820K

Anyone rebenched this on B-die? I have a feeling 1st is achievable.

Sparky necrobump ftw, commenting here as I may try this out "someday"

Screen from @Dancop

when looking at other results here, looks like that 52+ cache matters a whole lot

could make taking #1 kinda tough