macsbeach98 Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 Can someone tell me how to get a validation link for maxxmem. There is no where to upload a datafile on the MaxxPI site. Registration to the site is not real good, use the contact page, write what you want your Username to be and they will send you back an email telling you what password to use to which I haven't received a reply. Anyhow where do you logon anyway I dont even see anywhere to log on. So I thinks no worries I will connect the machine to the net and just upload straight from there and a webpage will open and I will just copy the address. No that dont happen either a green bar goes across the maxxmem score window with "Upload to MaxxPI successful" what so I go to the MaxxPI website the last validation there is on the 3rd of December. So I dont know I have run out of ideas. I can submit the run to the database no problems here http://hwbot.org/submission/3116271_ Just cannot submit here because of this Validation Link that plainly does not work. Can one of the moderators check this out and when you find out how to do this validation link let me know. Quote
Blutregen Posted February 3, 2016 Posted February 3, 2016 I think the problem is on this site. If you try to submit MaxxMem from regular HWBot.org link - it works fine without any verification link. Here it is - submitted throughout HWBot.org regular website - same thing doesn´t work here: http://hwbot.org/submission/3116751_blutregen_maxxmem_rdram_41.3_marks?recalculate=true No chance to submit MaxxMem Score on this site anyway. Quote
havli Posted February 4, 2016 Posted February 4, 2016 Same here, direct upload to maxxpi.net seems to be working, but no validation link is generated. Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 4, 2016 Administrators Posted February 4, 2016 I honestly don´t remember there ever was the chance to get a validation link, I just tested and nothing happened after I submitted to maxpi net - We will discuss this and if there is no way to get this verification link we will skip the link obligation Quote
max1024 Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Is it necessary on-line validation of Maxxmem ? If yes I have a problem, I have no internet where is my Socket423 PC, and also have no any lan card. Is it possible make validation via screenshot ??? Edited February 6, 2016 by max1024 Quote
max1024 Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Ok, I have make a save file, but where it upload? Try manually make a submission and see - "your submission is incorrect" ? http://hwbot.org/submission/3119578_ Edited February 6, 2016 by max1024 Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 6, 2016 Administrators Posted February 6, 2016 We will skip the validation as it seems to be impossible, I already created a task internally. If there is any way to make this validation possible of which I do not know of, I will let you know, but at my tests it did not work as well Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 8, 2016 Administrators Posted February 8, 2016 The need for a validation link for maxmem was removed, so if you want to submit it should work. Please let me know if you still encounter problems Quote
TASOS Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 I want to ask , if i can use a Quadro2 (which is also NV15) for the stage of 3dmark2000. http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocards#key=quadro2_pro Can i ? Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 10, 2016 Administrators Posted February 10, 2016 The rules are clear, it is not defined by Core (NV15) but Geforce 2 is asked for. Professional cards are no part of this line up. I hate to say this, but when we want to stay with current restrictions on hardware, the Quadro is not allowed Quote
Kvekan_SWE Posted February 11, 2016 Posted February 11, 2016 The rules are clear, it is not defined by Core (NV15) but Geforce 2 is asked for. Professional cards are no part of this line up. I hate to say this, but when we want to stay with current restrictions on hardware, the Quadro is not allowed Whats the difference? Its the exact same card with another bios as far as I know? Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 11, 2016 Administrators Posted February 11, 2016 The card has same Core and mems and different BIOS, yes. I thought about allowing it, but rules are formulated clearly and depend on series and not core model Quote
TerraRaptor Posted February 11, 2016 Posted February 11, 2016 I guess GPUZ won't detect nvstrap so that can be easily faked into GF2. Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 11, 2016 Administrators Posted February 11, 2016 I will judge by GPUZ, anything else is not my business - we all want clear rules to make things easy for contestants and mods, exceptions always lead to people complain at future contests and say "something similar was allowed there, and why isn´t it allowed now?". If I see a Geforce 2 at valid GPUZ with technical data proving it is geforce two by specs, I am happy Quote
zafiropo Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 socket 423 motherboard with adapter 423 to 478 cpu is allowed? Because i don't like this kind of surprises the very last moment............... Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 12, 2016 Administrators Posted February 12, 2016 (edited) The restrictions are clear, CPU 423 and geforce 2 and 423 CPU and RD Ram - you can use adapters because mainboards are not limited, we handle this the same way at div VII challenger, but S478 or other socket cpus are not allowed. I am not sure it is possible to use 423 CPU at other board with adapter tbh, but in theory it can be done Edited February 12, 2016 by websmile Quote
TASOS Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Oups I uploaded a wrong screenshot , with my latest result on 3dmark 2000 stage. Since i cannot edit the result anymore , can a moderator please fix it ? Many thanks Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 29, 2016 Administrators Posted February 29, 2016 (edited) This is no good, the result was already reported before you saw the wrong screen, and request comes after the competition is already over. The rules are clear that submissions on competitions can´t be edited anymore and further proof is not allowed, we only make excepetions at technical errors or bugs caused by database sometimes. I hate to say this, but the submission will have to be removed from the comp, you or staff can edit it but only for normal submission or ranking then - sorry, this is an essntial rule P.S. You can make an appeal to christian ney, maybe he approves that the sub counts, but I have no other choice, my friend Edited February 29, 2016 by websmile Quote
TASOS Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 This is no good, the result was already reported before you saw the wrong screen, and request comes after the competition is already over. The rules are clear that submissions on competitions can´t be edited anymore and further proof is not allowed, we only make excepetions at technical errors or bugs caused by database sometimes. I hate to say this, but the submission will have to be removed from the comp, you or staff can edit it but only for normal submission or ranking then - sorry, this is an essntial rule P.S. You can make an appeal to christian ney, maybe he approves that the sub counts, but I have no other choice, my friend Oh ,ok Yes i just saw that macsbeach98 , already reported my score. Let's pass it to Christian then , and let him decide about it. Quote
Administrators websmile Posted February 29, 2016 Administrators Posted February 29, 2016 I checked all and blocked some 2000s, interesting competition as usual @TASOS it will make no big difference if the score will re-appear, you are at 2nd tied with other team, then you might be 2nd alone, good you had a decent scores submitted already beforehand Quote
TASOS Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 I checked all and blocked some 2000s, interesting competition as usual @TASOS it will make no big difference if the score will re-appear, you are at 2nd tied with other team, then you might be 2nd alone, good you had a decent scores submitted already beforehand Well , dont go way ... reports coming Quote
macsbeach98 Posted March 1, 2016 Author Posted March 1, 2016 I dont mind if Tasos submission is reinstated I only reported it because it was the wrong screenshot. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.