-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[knopflerbruce]

FAKE: Rivatunner have the focus in taskbar but no window rivatuner focus.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686843

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346

 

Situations like that happens quite often to me here;) I noticed it once last night. No idea why it happens, but is there any other reason that this may be a fake score? Like a score that doesn't match the HW?

[Just Learnin']

Prescott in Northwood category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694722 user has points in both categories.

[alibabar]

Dear moderators,

 

I have some complains about some moderated scores. Can you please check again those one:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551858 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546205 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=764738 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546204 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!) Added!

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760157 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760391 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760170 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760235 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!)

 

Many thanks!

Edited August 23, 2008 by alibabar
added one more

[The Nemesis]

I'd like to know what am I missing that causes this result to be blocked.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=758341

[Just Learnin']

I'd like to know what am I missing that causes this result to be blocked.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=758341

 

This is what it says in the entry modifications log:

 

reported by user due to lack of validation (Screenshot is invalid - test results are absent.)

 

insufficient verification for rankings (Please make the screenshot more informative. The result window MUST be on the scrennshot. )

[The Nemesis]

This is what it says in the entry modifications log:

so result details are required? Not just the result score? This is getting irritating. At first the results block because it was covering up what resloution the benchmark was ran in. Now this.

Edited August 24, 2008 by The Nemesis

[Just Learnin']

so result details are required? Not just the result score? This is getting irritating. At first the results block because it was covering up what resloution the benchmark was ran in. Now this.

 

3DMark03 submission rules

[The Nemesis]

3DMark03 submission rules

 

Thanks for pointing me in the right directions. I ran the benchmark and included futmark link. Guess it's time to purchase '03 since free version only holds 5.

[chris_oktabit]

Hello guys,

I miss something in my wprime results and i dont know what, so...please help me to correct them.

For example this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=766180

 

The problem is at wprime version? or because cpu-z shows 1.000Mhz and no 2.000Mhz?

 

Please let me know to fix it.

 

Thanks!

 

Edit: Ok i find it, the problem is the wprime version.

Edited August 26, 2008 by chris_oktabit

[maxine]

Please fix this "Admin validated" results, tnx:

 

Resolution not showed:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971

 

6800ultra in 6800(simple) categ:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024

Edited August 28, 2008 by maxine

[Patrickclouds]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758106

 

the screenshot says 195sek but its uploaded with 2min 14sec (that would be about 134sec)

[u22]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768158

 

 

wprime @ AMD @ 0sec Global RANK 1

[S_A_V]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750467 - was checked by moderator

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=755636

 

One bugged score by dejanperkovic (OC-Lab2) with 3870X2+3870 and Maximus Formula posted in both HD3870X2 and HD3870 (3x crossfire) categories.... Maximus Formula have only two PCI-E x16 slots so there is no way to install three HD3870 cards on this mobo. Anyway it has bugged fps in Battle of Proxycon (1417 fps - no way) so both result entries must be removed.

Edited September 3, 2008 by S_A_V

[Just Learnin']

Prescott in Northwood category, person has points in both categories with this CPU: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694722

[Thor941]

Hi All,

 

I have submitted yesterday evening several scores but 2 have not been validated and I don't understand why, it was 1 score in 3DM01 and 1 in Wprime 32Mo

 

Can somebody from the crew tell me?

 

Thx a lot.

[71proste]

Pls delete it

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768071

reported few times already and nothing

Edited September 9, 2008 by 71proste

[71proste]

No I didn't,last time you said one time is enough,so im confuse now

I"ll do it,just give me few seconds

 

EDIT:

 

thanks,you're always the best

Edited September 9, 2008 by 71proste

[71proste]

I was joking

 

I know,me too mate ,heh

[71proste]

I was joking

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768064

 

did you removed,r you sure??

[71proste]

I knew it,ok cheers one more time

[maxine]

Please fix this "Admin validated" results, tnx:

 

Resolution not showed:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971

 

6800ultra in 6800(simple) categ:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024

[TASOS]

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=23197&postcount=137

[knopflerbruce]

it's not CF, it's a single X1900XTX Crossfire Edition.

 

 

 

dont know about the SuperPi score, none was deleted with 22.844

 

X1900 CF edition has xt clocks @ stock, so it should be in the xt-category, not xtx. FYI.

[Sweet]

Please check and delete these bad scores, , Wprime ver. 1.63 ( same guy...)

 

 

Please remind him, using WPrime 1.55 This is mandatory

 

WPrime 1024:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771790

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771756

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771737

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771724

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771717

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771684

 

Wprime 32:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771743

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771733

 

I report these, but so far, nothing

 

Thank you and regards

 

Sw

Edited September 14, 2008 by Sweet

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1371

 

Please take a look at the top spi1m score here. Something is weird, maybe a database bug:p

 

This score has no validation: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731337 - and the score itself is in a league of it's own it seems. Sub 26s on a 130nm with 512kb cache and single channel memory... I'd like to see that with my own eyes ;-)

 

3700+sd in 3700+ clawhamemr category (PS: nearly ALL scores are 3700+ sd's!):

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661418

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719517

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631559

Edited September 14, 2008 by knopflerbruce