Massman Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Alright, put this one up. Looking forward to see the comparison results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 intel score poorly on this? Perhaps intel should have kaby running xtu on one side and amd with a black screen on the other smh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMS Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) intel score poorly on this? Perhaps intel should have kaby running xtu on one side and amd with a black screen on the other smh Intel is fine on Blender... Throttling issues maybe? Anyway, for this challenge should we use default 200 samples or 100 like AMD used in Ryzen demo? Edited December 15, 2016 by NoMS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speed.fastest Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Hi, this is what make all score so slow... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skulstation Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) ware do we find the link for it? like to try it on some intel setups edit : i found the files on https://hardforum.com/threads/amd-ryzen-blender-benchmark-scores-thread.1919896/ the skulltrail is slow comparing to the rest Edited December 15, 2016 by skulstation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skulstation Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) plz chek ranking. slowest System is on top Edited December 15, 2016 by skulstation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Hi, this is what make all score so slow... Okay that makes much more sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moparman Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 The scoring is wrong for the comp. The Fastest is in last and slowest in first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatBoyNotSoSlim Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Oooh, this looks like fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 FX-8320E@5117MHz running Linux Mint 18 x64. On Windows 7 SP1 x64 it was more than 2 times slower! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeepBeep2 Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 @I\.nfraR\.ed Really interesting - can you (and others) try on Windows with the build that The Stilt posted here: https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/first-summit-ridge-zen-benchmarks.2482739/page-114#post-38629328 He and others had huge gains, because it seemed that the 2.78a build for Windows was not taking full advantage of AVX. For the sake of the Blender Challenge I think those should be limited to the official binary for now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 17, 2016 Crew Share Posted December 17, 2016 (edited) what an unreliable benchmark this is... fluctuates here 0.5-1 sec between runs on air clocks ... lol Edited December 17, 2016 by Leeghoofd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 (edited) @I\.nfraR\.ed Really interesting - can you (and others) try on Windows with the build that The Stilt posted here: https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/first-summit-ridge-zen-benchmarks.2482739/page-114#post-38629328 He and others had huge gains, because it seemed that the 2.78a build for Windows was not taking full advantage of AVX. For the sake of the Blender Challenge I think those should be limited to the official binary for now? Shaved 1 minute off. Still ~10 sec slower than Linux, but I'm on a very old Win 7 installation. It might be better on e.g. 10. So I guess the official Linux build is newer than official Win build. PS: Checked both timestamps and they match: both are compiled on 24.10.2016. Wonder if there will be such an improvement if someone compiles the linux version (update: building it right now). v2.78.4 for Linux (UNOFFICIAL, compiled from source) blender-2.78.4-unofficial-linux_x86_64.tar.bz2 Edited December 18, 2016 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davestarrr Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.