superpatodonaldo Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 Strange... not so strange see your sub Quote
Demac Posted June 30, 2017 Author Posted June 30, 2017 Completely different. 20000+ is different than 30000+. I just lower the freq so the prog would be slower -> higher bandwith. (according to my tests.) Quote
superpatodonaldo Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 same done by me, several test until reach it Quote
superpatodonaldo Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 PS probably (or obviously?) this is not a good benchmark for a division..... Quote
TASOS Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 Year 2017 People still wondering about the validity of this benchmark ??? It's proven more than enough , in the past ... that you can manipulate the score of this benchmark. Quote
Demac Posted June 30, 2017 Author Posted June 30, 2017 I believe that it shouldn't even be in hwbot list. Quote
Administrators websmile Posted June 30, 2017 Administrators Posted June 30, 2017 If we needed a last proof that maxmem is eol and should be made pointless, here we go - not your fault, I did chose it on purpose to see if new bugs turn up apart from the 1000 we know already - and yes, it did turn up Quote
Niuulh Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 His previous score, same frequencies and 1 minutes diference : http://hwbot.org/submission/3588455_ Quote
superpatodonaldo Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 @Niuulh not same frequencies as said, due to severeal test, lowering only cpu freq (by multiplier) and not ram freq, bandwidth increases; looking at DDR3 MaxxMem Read Bandwidth's ranking there are a lot of subs with lower cpu freq and high bandwidth Quote
darkgregor Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 The best, is to redo the bench, to verify and close the debate Fairplay for ever ^^ Quote
Niuulh Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 I like like you defend yourself, you double your score by downclocking and try to make it legit... Seriously.... You force a run bug and have no shame to sumbit it..... o/ Quote
Demac Posted July 1, 2017 Author Posted July 1, 2017 (edited) Th problem with this bench is that even if we redo the bench how would we know that e.g the 17000 would be legit and it doesn't mean 15000? We will never know for sure. And as we all know the program has a lot bugs. Actually it isn't a bug run. By lowering the mhz you give it more time to "pass" mb/s. Edited July 1, 2017 by Demac Quote
rockeur.alexis Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 Oh gosh, this is the end of Overclocking now its downclocking time, run bug 10K diff and nobody kick that score ? And since when downclocking give more bandwith.... Quote
superpatodonaldo Posted May 10, 2018 Posted May 10, 2018 wow, still talking about this; why no one complain about hwboints are still alive on wellknownbugged benchs? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.