der8auer Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Heya yesterday i benched the laptop of my brother (IBM X41). SuperPi, wPrime, PiFast worked all fine but i can't get a CPU-Z validation?! v. 1.51 If i save the .cvf file and try to upload it this error appears: File cpuz_21.cvf upload : OK Dump corrupted .! If i try to validate it via CPU-Z directy it says "Error" and the Errormessage is just "6" So wtf? Can you help me? Thanks very much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Never had such a problem, but have you tried both CPU-Z-version with(out) setup.exe? Does this problem also happen at default frequency, so you can be sure it`s not a stability problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted June 22, 2009 Author Share Posted June 22, 2009 CPU isn't overclocked. Also tried the setup.exe but no success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 CPU-Z gets more shabby with every new version it seems. Contact the guys from CPU-Z, but I don't know if they will be kind enough to solve your problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted June 22, 2009 Author Share Posted June 22, 2009 Mhhh okay. Thought there would be a easier solution for me. But thats definitely too much work for 2 points Thanks for your answers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Same happens to me. With K10.5 chips I always get rejected validation, no matter if it's overclocked or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 There`s really a validation problem with CPU-Z (validator). For example this rejection maybe could be explained by the special CPU we used, but today a forum mate explained, that this rejection (6h primestable) also happens at 3.2 GHz (48h primestable) and so on. A Q9550 is neither new nor rare, so CPU-Z validator became bitchy as Monstru mentioned already. There are many examples and IMO the worst about the whole rejection problem is, that this happens so random and there`s no way to anticipate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psynapse Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 I can't get a validation with my current setup either. I'm also using 1.51. I get no errors or corruption messages, just the big red cross and a message at the top saying rejceted by CPUZ 1.51 I've noticed a lot of these lately and I never noticed it before new version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Rejected doesn't really mean anything these days because of that issue. But it's not a real problem, as you WILL get a link with all the details. A REAL problem would be if the file wouldn't be uploaded at all:p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 But rejected is a hint for cheated results, isn`t it? It`s NOT(!) my intention to claim "if you get a rejected result, you cheated for sure" (then I would call myself a cheater...), but if we accept rejected results all cheaters will misuse our trust for sure. So it`s up to Franck to fix this and not to us to accept rejected scores. Well, even validated scores don`t have to be correct, but you know what I want to say... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Unfortunately I am seeing more and more problems with CPU-Z lately, and by no means any kind attitude from them towards solving them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol'Bud Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 I have the same rejection issues, but as soon as it is rejected I re-submit and it is validated. A bit confusing, isn't it? And now i am not getting the customary email regarding the submission with the secret link in it. I wonder why that is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dx4picco Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 hi guys, I'm having the same issue with my validation. I benched for the first time under LN² this weekend with team mates, when I go back home and wanted to upload the cpuz file i got this error: File cpuz6321_3.cvf upload : OK Dump corrupted ! its the validation of max screen on my phenom II X4 960T @6321mhz. BTW lower screen are having the same problem, exactly same error. Is there any way to fix it? (lastest cpuz version was used) regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Unless you get the same error with .cvf files made at lower freqs, what you have seems like a typical case of a corrupt .cvf file due to an unstable system (in which case there is nothing you can do). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dx4picco Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 firstly thanks for answer , en then bad answer for me im sad to hear that... Any other (brighter) point of view Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dx4picco Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 good news: I take back original cvf file on hard drive and not with usb drive: every thing worked well. So file was corrupt by usb transfert. thanks all fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolp1974 Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 I wish they would sort there site out, tried 3 different files, also newer cpuz and cant validate this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 I wish they would sort there site out, tried 3 different files, also newer cpuz and cant validate this You can no longer validate older dumps than new version Christian explains it here: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=142936 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Yep, you need 1.73! Shoot New a PM with validation info and he should be able to do it for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolp1974 Posted August 25, 2015 Share Posted August 25, 2015 Shoot New?? A PM or is that Ney? If its christian i already have, not had a reply as yet so he may be busy or away?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.