dhenzjhen Posted September 19, 2013 Posted September 19, 2013 LOL i never tried it, how can i give an explaination? however i have from time to time seen crazy out of line scores with different storage configs and this looks like a crazy out of line score No worries I already put it back in the cabinet to continue collecting dust Quote
IanCutress Posted September 19, 2013 Posted September 19, 2013 No worries I already put it back in the cabinet to continue collecting dust Send it over here, I'm sure I can find a use for it Quote
dhenzjhen Posted September 19, 2013 Posted September 19, 2013 Send it over here, I'm sure I can find a use for it Lol Ian, that would need my amigo's approval or maybe Andy has got one too Quote
Johni5 Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 (edited) I installed the system so that one SSD in the system, but the other windows SSD 100MB file. The problem is, however, so that the xp startup 288MB/sec. But that's not trickery. By contrast, the 220MB/sec limit. NOT RAID!. NOT RAID! http://www.kepfeltoltes.hu/140112/638739995N_vtelen_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg Edited January 12, 2014 by Johni5 Quote
Moose83 Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 U have to slow down to keep 220MB/s Thats not trickey Controller scores 1600+ Quote
Luebke Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 controller scores, mouse scores... does the cpu matter? Quote
Moose83 Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Improve some Tweaking 52k TW and 65 WebPR with 4,9 Haswell :nana: I will share, when i have run it cold Quote
ObscureParadox Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Very nice result as always moose, looking forward to seeing what sort of score you are going to be able to get with that 4770K Edit : Have you tried the 290X out on 05 yet and does it give you better results over the 7970? Quote
Moose83 Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 First its 4670k 2nd its r9 290, not 290x R9 290(X) is faster than 7970, Lightning 7970 at 1620/2000 scores less than r9 290 at 1150/1450 Quote
ObscureParadox Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 I didn't really look at the screenshot and didn't see a GPU-Z tab so just asked the question Good to know kinda thought that would be the answer Quote
chispy Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 Improve some Tweaking 52k TW and 65 WebPR with 4,9 Haswell :nana: I will share, when i have run it cold LOL Holgert that means Haswell at around ~6.3Ghz will score well over 125k TW and Well over 100WebPR compared with your last score http://hwbot.org/submission/2483778_moose83_pcmark_2005_core_i5_4670k_71582_marks , those "tweaks" plus your dual Areca set up with Areca drivers will get you a score of a Gazillion points PCmark05 . " sometimes I wonder ... ,oh and don't forget memory access tweak too ! Quote
Moose83 Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 No, i think arround 70k TW and 90 webPR Dual Areca i dont play anymore, some guys dont like it Its no App needed for this, with F2D or Autosizer i get 120k at 4,9 Quote
chispy Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 No, i think arround 70k TW and 90 webPR Dual Areca i dont play anymore, some guys dont like it Its no App needed for this, with F2D or Autosizer i get 120k at 4,9 Nice Quote
Stermy57 Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 (edited) I want to do good scores with this benchmark, i try all tweaks allowed, but i have one problem. If i run one test and than another one, for example 2d transparent and than web pages, the 2d transparent losts its record... Only if I run all testes there is no problem... So how can I do tweaks on each single test if I must run pcmark05's tests all together? Edited March 23, 2014 by Stermy57 Quote
Stermy57 Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Automation. Sorry I don't understand... What does it mean "automation" Quote
Stermy57 Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 You must run all test one after next Moose thanks for your answer and support So, I can run the tests on fly only if I run them one after next with the default sequence? Quote
d3mox Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Moose thanks for your answer and support So, I can run the tests on fly only if I run them one after next with the default sequence? Yup Quote
Moose83 Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Single test set is only for testing tweaks in Subtests Nice to see new faces in the Bench Quote
Stermy57 Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Single test set is only for testing tweaks in Subtests Nice to see new faces in the Bench Done I Will post the score hier I have found same tweaks on pcmark04 to improve global score, around 200\300 points. Quote
Stermy57 Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 200/300p is nothing But 200/300 points with an unknown register tweaks For all my tweaks maybe I have improve something like 900/1000 points! Quote
Moose83 Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 Not all is written in this threat Registry Registry Registry Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.