dracosc Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680937 This is my wrong Sandra score! Please delete it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiiioo Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 sandra is not allowed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hello try to solve this problem, any post anything and give points ... This is a problem, the report over three times and have not done anything . http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681581 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681582 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680635 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680978 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681443 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680179 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609284 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579758 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635774 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635779 Etc..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seewolf Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hi, please can you check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606860 I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock. thx Seewolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 thats right, i ask about more Proof Only what i see it´s a diffrent version of PiFast, but 10 seconds with 100 mhz more - i think no. i will check it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hi, please can you check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606860 I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock. thx Seewolf This is pifast version 4.3 The result must be deleted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678463 sli score in single kategorie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 Please fix these results.... 2nd place ... but bronze cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 3rd place ... but silver cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killer55555 Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571662 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576682 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573649 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561822 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576508 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591518 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609920 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545647 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511193 Lots of them doesn't have screenshot or links and others are invalid.Please fix it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191 I agree. All results of the user are incorrect. Example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670450 Result on 7950GT, but category 7600GT. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672090 The videocard is not specified. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677698 The CPU is not specified. All AM3 results very strange. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640318 Unreal result, because extreme overclock X700 Pro (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630421) has 11109 marks. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651255 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606217 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=512329 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606220 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607257 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632987 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672320 Screenshot is wrong. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574048 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601228 Error in computation. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667106 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574053 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666501 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574813 CPU-Z is not shown. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594889 Correct result 75 seconds , instead of 115 seconds. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571520 Cheksum invalid. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577373 Cheksum invalid. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577372 Cheksum invalid. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574286 Result on Celeron 320 WPrime 1024Mb, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz WPrime 32Mb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mache Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682998 9700 mobility instead of hd 2400 mobility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682979http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682998 9700 mobility instead of hd 2400 mobility inversely -> hd 2400 mobility instead of 9700 mobility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683577 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683557 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634247 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634730 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634716 Resolution is not show http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682673 Result on socket 939, but category 754. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 I think both of these users results should be looked into for AM3. Unusual for two members of same team to have results for a 7200GS 64mb, 128, and a 256 and all only in AM3. Also both have at least one extremely skewed result. One over 58k and another over 62k on a 64mb card? http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10009 http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680318 joke:D http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=594886 project is not valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592868 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=583902 no verification first two places same guy!! http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7900+GTX+%281165%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=741&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 GeForce 7600 GS DDR2Damikor - Cheater, all results on cheater driver. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670589 nature not real http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670590 WoF 700+))) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670593 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641930 SLI? ddr3? cpu (Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 2730mhz on air) and 17173 marks is LOL. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668487 DDR3 Galaxy 7600GS Zalman 256MB(792(729)/1840)/vmod http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 DDR3 or not 7600...Processor: Core 2 E4300 @ 3150mhz...140k LOL))) GeForce 8500 GT DDR2 512 Mb DeathRO (ROClockers Benching Team) all results on cheaters drivers by GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675199 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675207 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675571 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675215 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679849 not real on E4400 MaSell (Team OCX) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672 Hipo (United Team of Poland) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616 Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650657 P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) Cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 not real on Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2 !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Please fix these results.... 2nd place ... but bronze cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 3rd place ... but silver cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 UP ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 UP ... 1st link are ok to me Hardware Rank: 3rd Pentium M 440 Celeron = bronze medal 2nd link too Hardware Rank: 2nd Pentium M 440 Celeron = silver medal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Sorry to not have fixed these, but I'm in the middle of my exams and I still have a lot to do. will try to fix this asap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 1st link are ok to me Hardware Rank: 3rd Pentium M 440 Celeron = bronze medal 2nd link too Hardware Rank: 2nd Pentium M 440 Celeron = silver medal Sorry,maybe i didnt described it clearly. I have 1867.00 submitted on 16/09/2007 and i am 3rd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 "Kszonek" has 1866.80 submitted on 17/10/2007 and he's 2nd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAH Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Here are a few to check. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642574 Device ID = 0X9588 This is a HD 2600XT not a PRO. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649344 Clearly shows in Riva its a HD 2600XT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642575 Device ID = 0X9588 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jowi69 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684834 Result on CF not single card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAH Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 These look odd. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640343 Nothing matches FM link shows P4 333 FSB - would need a 13 divider - E6850 doesn't have. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677781 FM link show P4 Can't see card type in AMD Clock. 975 Core speed - 2600XT ?? http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9249190 FM link shows P4 No way to confirm card. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649345 Mark clearly shows as HD 2600XT - IN PRO http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642574 Device ID 0X9588 (Bn:4, DN:0) - 2600 XT - could be CF - in PRO http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649344 Clearly shows as 2600XT in PRO http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642575 Device ID 0x9588 (BN:4, Dn:0) - XT - CF?? in PRO One other thing I have noticed. Would like some opinions on. A lot of people using GPU-ID have "Unknown" in subvendor. Modding a card with new bios, Voltmod, etc, doesn't bother me. Good for them, they can do more then I can. But if this "unknown" is caused by putting say a HD 2600PRo bios on a HD 2600XT card, to make it a PRO, I consider this cheating. You? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts