mAlkAv!An Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Cheat: wrong resolution(1280x800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 Second time he's trying this with same sys. First one has been deleted because of same reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Cheat: wrong resolution(1280x800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 Second time he's trying this with same sys. First one has been deleted because of same reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 But if someone has wide LCD in his notebook, it isn't possible to run 3d mark 2006 in 1280x1024 res, only in 1280x800. Although, it can depends on version of 3d mark - in basic version, you cannot change anything, so then resolution should be standard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 It's just not regular and not fair according to other users. If i would have only an old 15" CRT for benching f.e. with no 1280x1024 support i have simply bad luck. Either the guy dont submit such results or he got to use an external monitor for this benchmark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676864 The score is too big for such clocks. Compare with http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684256 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 fake or probably running SLI in single card category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 It's just not regular and not fair according to other users.If i would have only an old 15" CRT for benching f.e. with no 1280x1024 support i have simply bad luck. Either the guy dont submit such results or he got to use an external monitor for this benchmark. exactly-u'r right mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Multiple 7600GS AGP? lol. Plus no screen, no link, no verification. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636397 Cheat, to high scores, resolution hidden. Perhaps SLI-Setup. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700214 Same... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1196 all results posted by AN7 OverClocker are fake! It is not visible anywhere, that results put on tested x1650Pro DDR2... It has not given any proofs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted February 18, 2008 Author Share Posted February 18, 2008 Why are the Guys in Videocard Radeon HD 3870 X2 Posting in the (multiple cards): when they have only one card http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1279 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690407 Wrong category - Yonah in Northwood category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505889 Wrong category - AXP Mobile in AXP category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701697 The benchmark was not run using default settings New rules are necessary, changing Z buffer is received chit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685155 X2 4400+ Brisbane or Windsor in Toledo rank http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686907 Athlon 3500+ in Sempron 3500+ rank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674334 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674269 WTF???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 12 days ago I asked to fix some wrong results - http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15725&postcount=1022 still no reaction. When it will be fixed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688350 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592683 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 - sli or low resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 How much time will it take to learn fucking rules of submit screenshote? WTF? - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702087 (It is necessary to open details of the passed test) And my, normal: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701995 (Verfication post tomorrow in the morning) And my bast (proper\clear\right) exact screenshote (+Verfication): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 From when is it necessary to open details of the passed test??heh??tell me?? Why U used such words like "fuck.."etc... I dont see any problem with screen U markt as"WTF" Can I ask U one thing?WTF is wrong with U???Take it easy budy.. If u'r in top 20 U have to show verification link otherwise just visible screen with resolution and name of card(and gpu-z if is more than one version of card,like 256 and 512mb) R U angry because someone had better score than U-boloxxxxxxxxxxxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... lol!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 + + http://www.controlf.com.ua/product/msi_rx1650-td256e/?p=info !!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 All right Nordling ... I'm telling you we have different cards ... Don't make me angry now, it's so simple ... X1650 AGP and X1650 PCI-E ARE DIFFERENT ! I didn't implement that you posted results done with a X1650 Pro, but that you are in the wrong category ... In my defense when I saw that there is no proper category for my X1650 AGP I PMed Bwanasoft and he created it ... Why don't you do the same thing, so that a new X1650 PCI-E category is created ? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 AMD Thorton Core in Sempron 2800+ Thoroughbred category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694260 CPU-Z http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694263 SuperPi 1M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694264 SuperPi 32M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694262 Pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694265 wPrime 32M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694266 wPrime 1024M Pls fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 How much time will it take to learn fucking rules of submit screenshote?WTF? - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702087 (It is necessary to open details of the passed test) And my, normal: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701995 (Verfication post tomorrow in the morning) And my bast (proper\clear\right) exact screenshote (+Verfication): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 Lol owned! Learn the rules yourself, I guess:D As you just noticed yourself, sometimes people make (stupid) mistakes. No reason to get upset because of that, all you need to do is post the link and perhaps explain the problem if it isn't obvious (like NO verification at all). And... It's VERY good advice to actually verify that the list for your GPU exists before submitting scores, there are so many different sorts... DDR2/DDR3 agp/pcie etc etc. Makes it alot easier for the mods if they don't have to move a whole bunch of entries to new categories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts