Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result

THRASHER2

By THRASHER2
in Submission & member moderation

 Share

Recommended Posts

klopcha Collaborator

klopcha

Posted
Posted
Should all be fixed :)

Big thank's.

 

If do not object I shall continue...

 

If results 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked.

Please blocked http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=623885

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610156 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

(copy http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610110)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507506 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=500893 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505284 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=551931 The videocard is not specified

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=597018 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547482 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=552510 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505532 Result on 6800AGP, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506127 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506137 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545458 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487726 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610103 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

( and copy http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610191 )

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487727 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487728 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511282 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505932 Result on 6800AGP, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=549188 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=551375 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505161 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511384 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=397855 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487736 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487737 No link, no screenshot.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504111 and

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548316 No link, no screenshot. One user in different commands.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545460 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610188

(and copy http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610114 ) Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547273 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504016 Result on 6800AGP, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=567667

and http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=572073 One user in different commands.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610152 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610629 Result on 7900GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610092 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=551929 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=527555 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550140 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=503214 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=567668 and

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570346 One user in different commands.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=565933 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=574087 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=566881 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=565895 No link, no screenshot.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668508 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668552 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661112 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656711 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

And Adjustments not by default (max. Anis 1)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656695 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=644024 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610702 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668579 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=646720 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668503 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668561 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668563 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=611777 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

 

MOD ENTRY

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653104 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668483 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668450 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668463 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643871 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649996 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587751 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP.

(Screenshot by Radeon X1300)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668454 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587742 Link by 7800, sreenshot by 7900.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668437 The result without user, how can it be?

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645318 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643971 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657614 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668624 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653121 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661365 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668609 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668606 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668622 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587483 Link is invalid, sreenshot by configuration.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=652154 To look complaints above.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656979 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643862 To look complaints above.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=663449 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625132 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

 

 

All results with http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668271 up http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668708 without user.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

71proste Newbie

71proste

Posted
Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=663868 need more proof

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666195 need more proof,no card name

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658273 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667313 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=664828 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666769 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666767 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666768 no resolutio

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661352 project is not valid

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675351 wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670942 wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ovca Newbie

ovca

Posted
Posted

here I go then :

its from an email I just received from hwbot-and Im not sure whether it is possible to reply to that e.mail adress.

 

Hello,

 

An hwbot crew member, Bwanasoft, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'not ran at default settings because of hardware limitations'.

 

This was the reason the user gave:

only one Game Test

 

You can view your result here:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672786

 

You can find out more about the reporting user here:

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=8809

 

Yours sincerely,

the hwbot.org team

I wasnt aware that running gametests in 3dmark2001 in succesion is forbidden. I ran all the game tests one by one,with a 30sec. pause between for cooling down vga, which in the end got me a valid result ,no? anyway, i apologize once again if I misplaced this reply...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Freakezoit Newbie

Freakezoit

Posted
Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675478

First it Looks like an fake 8400GS with 128bit memory bus

512MB and 8 Rop`s from Gigabyte but gigabyte doesn`t have such a Card

second with near same cpu clock but lower gpu and shader clock he has 9k more in aq3 thats not possible.

and here look at these specs same card but an 8500gt seems to me like an strapped rom. Bios and the other specs like 512mb default clock are the same as above but it is an 8500gt!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675570

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ovca Newbie

ovca

Posted
Posted

can someone verify that this result is valid:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659891

as you can see, there no 2nd thread calculation and I suppose 2nd core got lost somewhere in the process due to 2high overclock(thats what happened to mine brisbane when I tried 3.3ghz - it finished calculation,but 2nd core somehow dissapeared)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Freakezoit Newbie

Freakezoit

Posted
Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676391

 

Verification shows an Ati X1900 Gpu but its in the NV 8600GTS Ranking and his Nature test score can`t be that high (465 @ 870 gpu, i have 388 @ 990Mhz GPU)

Futuremark shows same points in all test as this one

User uses the same futuremark link (But with edited Project details)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631790

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CuB3 Newbie

CuB3

Posted
Posted

These users have a X1300 with 256MB instead of 128MB!

 

1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610037

2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618238

 

This is the Futuremark Link for the result:

1. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3098321

2. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1704192

 

This user has no verification link, only a piece of a screenshot, that everyone could have made on it's own:

3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572186

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676391

 

Verification shows an Ati X1900 Gpu but its in the NV 8600GTS Ranking and his Nature test score can`t be that high (465 @ 870 gpu, i have 388 @ 990Mhz GPU)

Futuremark shows same points in all test as this one

User uses the same futuremark link (But with edited Project details)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631790

 

Fixed

 

 

Fixed

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675042

Single Card instead of an sli.

 

fixed

 

Similar prob as on post 801# (Same User)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672439

Card specs like Bios default clock etc. are the same

Like this one

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673759

Seems a bit strange!

 

Seems like two different cards to me

 

can someone verify that this result is valid:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659891

as you can see, there no 2nd thread calculation and I suppose 2nd core got lost somewhere in the process due to 2high overclock(thats what happened to mine brisbane when I tried 3.3ghz - it finished calculation,but 2nd core somehow dissapeared)

 

You can manually set the number of threads

 

This is an Opteron 144 (socket 939) in a Lanparty NF4-D running an 6800 card (see ORB link). THIS MOBO NOT HAVE AGP SLOT.....so, please move to the correct category (P.Express instead AGP)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661112

 

fixed

 

dear m8ts please look this result it is posted in wrong

area the test is for wprime32m and it is posted in wprime1024 area

 

edit....

the notice is for the first result by polonos

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633337

 

fixed

 

This score looks like a regular FX5200 ... not a FX5200SE

Maybe i'm wrong.

Can some moderator ask for a gpu-z or rivatuner screenshot ?

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675595

 

fixed

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675478

First it Looks like an fake 8400GS with 128bit memory bus

512MB and 8 Rop`s from Gigabyte but gigabyte doesn`t have such a Card

second with near same cpu clock but lower gpu and shader clock he has 9k more in aq3 thats not possible.

and here look at these specs same card but an 8500gt seems to me like an strapped rom. Bios and the other specs like 512mb default clock are the same as above but it is an 8500gt!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675570

 

fixed

 

These users have a X1300 with 256MB instead of 128MB!

 

1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610037

2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618238

 

This is the Futuremark Link for the result:

1. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3098321

2. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1704192

 

This user has no verification link, only a piece of a screenshot, that everyone could have made on it's own:

3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572186

 

fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted

 

I can see the resolution

 

 

Fixed

 

here I go then :

its from an email I just received from hwbot-and Im not sure whether it is possible to reply to that e.mail adress.

 

 

I wasnt aware that running gametests in 3dmark2001 in succesion is forbidden. I ran all the game tests one by one,with a 30sec. pause between for cooling down vga, which in the end got me a valid result ,no? anyway, i apologize once again if I misplaced this reply...

 

Fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...