http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2384991

 

New World Record of CPU Frequency at 8805.64MHz ! it not my stuff but.... from our forums member named " ksin " he braking new world record of CPU frequency by AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 at 8805.64MHz and only using LN2, this clock are crazy it close to 9GHz and you can looking more details and some results (SuperPi@8.5GHz)from him by here >> http://www.overclockzone.com/forums/showthread.php/1533313-lt-lt/page62

awesome cpu

multiplier 29 is damn low

 

CPU maxed out ?

let's see if Andre has a backup

Is this really legit? It's a BIG jump, using just LN2 and low voltage.....

15s superpi @ 8.3 Ghz ?

 

15s superpi for bulldozer it's 5.6-5.7 GHz or so

Edited May 28, 201213 yr by Christian Ney

multiplier 29 is damn low

 

CPU maxed out ?

 

Not sure because I did not stay there with him today. But yesterday we are just disappointed with the Ivy Bridge together.

 

Is this really legit? It's a BIG jump, using just LN2 and low voltage.....

 

Yah very big jump but maybe new lot of FX can do like this because this chip just bought yesterday and unbox(Maybe can ) today.... boom ! WR

Do you have any batch and wafer info?

I'll ask to him take photo for you maybe tomorrow i will can get that

got a new batch too, very recent, I may test it then

I'll ask to him take photo for you maybe tomorrow i will can get that

 

Thanks bro

Whoa

holy crap that is a high frequency, nice to know people are still playing bulldozer

 

Edit: any reason the picture has to be so slow lol.

picture is being hosted by some other website.

Possibly bugged? Spi time is really slow and htt + ram kinda high for validation.

 

If that's right it's time to dress troufman up as Goku and go for 9ghz

Yep, pi at that frequency is super slow. Could that frequency be replicated with lower HTref and higher multi or at least get close to it?

Voltage seems low as well, but everything is possible.

 

Pi result might be bad if other cores are clocked much lower and no affinity is set?

he probably didnt select the core that was running at that frequency hence why Pi is "slow"

btw is this submission blocked? I don't understand )

Thanks bro

 

Your welcome bro and about pcb code he will give me later.

 

btw is this submission blocked? I don't understand )

 

Yah.. why it blocked i need to know about reason and why cpuid rejected too ?

 

btw. for hwbot block i understand because following cpuz validation that the rule

cpuid/cpuz rejected the validation because cpu was throttling so 8.8 GHz wasn't the real frequency that's why the superpi score was so low/slow

cpuid/cpuz rejected the validation because cpu was throttling so 8.8 GHz wasn't the real frequency that's why the superpi score was so low/slow

 

Ahh i see, so that mean some bug from system right for showing it to 8.8GHz ?

 

Thanks for answer

 

______________________________

 

Last update... he just try again to night and i don't know it is still throttling again or not but he can get a little bit more MHz to 8855.2MHz now !

 

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2385936

 

 

btw. waiting for cpuid checking

Edited May 28, 201213 yr by ZoLKoRn

Yes to be simple 8.8 GHz was kind of target speed but cpu was throttling at 5.607 GHz

I kinda wondered..... but the feeling of 8.8GHz was nice while it lasted.

 

 

9062MHz "that easy" at <1.90v. Sorry, it's getting a little bit silly now.

 

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2385966

Edited May 28, 201213 yr by K404

but cpuz validates it... amd to be blamed? or is this another tesellation tweak? lol

if it is a bug with mobo/cpu/whatever why appeared now?

noone had this problem before?