ZoLKoRn Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2384991 New World Record of CPU Frequency at 8805.64MHz ! it not my stuff but.... from our forums member named " ksin " he braking new world record of CPU frequency by AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 at 8805.64MHz and only using LN2, this clock are crazy it close to 9GHz and you can looking more details and some results (SuperPi@8.5GHz)from him by here >> http://www.overclockzone.com/forums/showthread.php/1533313-lt-lt/page62 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 awesome cpu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 multiplier 29 is damn low CPU maxed out ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 let's see if Andre has a backup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 Is this really legit? It's a BIG jump, using just LN2 and low voltage..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 (edited) 15s superpi @ 8.3 Ghz ? 15s superpi for bulldozer it's 5.6-5.7 GHz or so Edited May 28, 2012 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoLKoRn Posted May 27, 2012 Author Share Posted May 27, 2012 multiplier 29 is damn low CPU maxed out ? Not sure because I did not stay there with him today. But yesterday we are just disappointed with the Ivy Bridge together. Is this really legit? It's a BIG jump, using just LN2 and low voltage..... Yah very big jump but maybe new lot of FX can do like this because this chip just bought yesterday and unbox(Maybe can ) today.... boom ! WR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 Do you have any batch and wafer info? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoLKoRn Posted May 27, 2012 Author Share Posted May 27, 2012 I'll ask to him take photo for you maybe tomorrow i will can get that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 got a new batch too, very recent, I may test it then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 I'll ask to him take photo for you maybe tomorrow i will can get that Thanks bro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Whoa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 holy crap that is a high frequency, nice to know people are still playing bulldozer Edit: any reason the picture has to be so slow lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 picture is being hosted by some other website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Possibly bugged? Spi time is really slow and htt + ram kinda high for validation. If that's right it's time to dress troufman up as Goku and go for 9ghz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Yep, pi at that frequency is super slow. Could that frequency be replicated with lower HTref and higher multi or at least get close to it? Voltage seems low as well, but everything is possible. Pi result might be bad if other cores are clocked much lower and no affinity is set? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 he probably didnt select the core that was running at that frequency hence why Pi is "slow" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaJ0r Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 btw is this submission blocked? I don't understand ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoLKoRn Posted May 28, 2012 Author Share Posted May 28, 2012 Thanks bro Your welcome bro and about pcb code he will give me later. btw is this submission blocked? I don't understand ) Yah.. why it blocked i need to know about reason and why cpuid rejected too ? btw. for hwbot block i understand because following cpuz validation that the rule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 cpuid/cpuz rejected the validation because cpu was throttling so 8.8 GHz wasn't the real frequency that's why the superpi score was so low/slow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoLKoRn Posted May 28, 2012 Author Share Posted May 28, 2012 (edited) cpuid/cpuz rejected the validation because cpu was throttling so 8.8 GHz wasn't the real frequency that's why the superpi score was so low/slow Ahh i see, so that mean some bug from system right for showing it to 8.8GHz ? Thanks for answer ______________________________ Last update... he just try again to night and i don't know it is still throttling again or not but he can get a little bit more MHz to 8855.2MHz now ! http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2385936 btw. waiting for cpuid checking Edited May 28, 2012 by ZoLKoRn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Yes to be simple 8.8 GHz was kind of target speed but cpu was throttling at 5.607 GHz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 (edited) I kinda wondered..... but the feeling of 8.8GHz was nice while it lasted. 9062MHz "that easy" at <1.90v. Sorry, it's getting a little bit silly now. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2385966 Edited May 28, 2012 by K404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 but cpuz validates it... amd to be blamed? or is this another tesellation tweak? lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amdnord Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 if it is a bug with mobo/cpu/whatever why appeared now? noone had this problem before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.