Posted May 27, 201213 yr http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2384991 New World Record of CPU Frequency at 8805.64MHz ! it not my stuff but.... from our forums member named " ksin " he braking new world record of CPU frequency by AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 at 8805.64MHz and only using LN2, this clock are crazy it close to 9GHz and you can looking more details and some results (SuperPi@8.5GHz)from him by here >> http://www.overclockzone.com/forums/showthread.php/1533313-lt-lt/page62
May 27, 201213 yr 15s superpi @ 8.3 Ghz ? 15s superpi for bulldozer it's 5.6-5.7 GHz or so Edited May 28, 201213 yr by Christian Ney
May 27, 201213 yr Author multiplier 29 is damn low CPU maxed out ? Not sure because I did not stay there with him today. But yesterday we are just disappointed with the Ivy Bridge together. Is this really legit? It's a BIG jump, using just LN2 and low voltage..... Yah very big jump but maybe new lot of FX can do like this because this chip just bought yesterday and unbox(Maybe can ) today.... boom ! WR
May 28, 201213 yr holy crap that is a high frequency, nice to know people are still playing bulldozer Edit: any reason the picture has to be so slow lol.
May 28, 201213 yr Possibly bugged? Spi time is really slow and htt + ram kinda high for validation. If that's right it's time to dress troufman up as Goku and go for 9ghz
May 28, 201213 yr Yep, pi at that frequency is super slow. Could that frequency be replicated with lower HTref and higher multi or at least get close to it? Voltage seems low as well, but everything is possible. Pi result might be bad if other cores are clocked much lower and no affinity is set?
May 28, 201213 yr he probably didnt select the core that was running at that frequency hence why Pi is "slow"
May 28, 201213 yr Author Thanks bro Your welcome bro and about pcb code he will give me later. btw is this submission blocked? I don't understand ) Yah.. why it blocked i need to know about reason and why cpuid rejected too ? btw. for hwbot block i understand because following cpuz validation that the rule
May 28, 201213 yr cpuid/cpuz rejected the validation because cpu was throttling so 8.8 GHz wasn't the real frequency that's why the superpi score was so low/slow
May 28, 201213 yr Author cpuid/cpuz rejected the validation because cpu was throttling so 8.8 GHz wasn't the real frequency that's why the superpi score was so low/slow Ahh i see, so that mean some bug from system right for showing it to 8.8GHz ? Thanks for answer ______________________________ Last update... he just try again to night and i don't know it is still throttling again or not but he can get a little bit more MHz to 8855.2MHz now ! http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2385936 btw. waiting for cpuid checking Edited May 28, 201213 yr by ZoLKoRn
May 28, 201213 yr Yes to be simple 8.8 GHz was kind of target speed but cpu was throttling at 5.607 GHz
May 28, 201213 yr I kinda wondered..... but the feeling of 8.8GHz was nice while it lasted. 9062MHz "that easy" at <1.90v. Sorry, it's getting a little bit silly now. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2385966 Edited May 28, 201213 yr by K404
May 28, 201213 yr but cpuz validates it... amd to be blamed? or is this another tesellation tweak? lol
May 28, 201213 yr if it is a bug with mobo/cpu/whatever why appeared now? noone had this problem before?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.