Massman Posted September 16, 2013 Posted September 16, 2013 Odd choice of memory divider. In my testing, 3:10 > 1:4 > 3:14 for memory performance (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=136877&postcount=37) Quote
The Stilt Posted September 16, 2013 Posted September 16, 2013 Odd choice of memory divider. In my testing, 3:10 > 1:4 > 3:14 for memory performance (http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=136877&postcount=37) I calibrate the RdPtrInit etc values by hand. There is no difference in performance after that. The different DRAM Pll Multiplier + Divider combinations result different duty cycles, however they do not have effect on performance. Besides, my PSCs (the PCB) was damaged after running on UP4. It is not a very good idea to extract the modules when they are frozen solid into the slot... Previously DDR-2666 with 9-11-8 timings was not a issue, now around DDR-2500 is the maximum. Quote
BeepBeep2 Posted September 16, 2013 Posted September 16, 2013 Your result is magnificent, congrats sorry to hear about your Flares. Quote
dinos22 Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 lol massman, one does not simply question The Stilt. Well done man! Quote
HiVizMan Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 An outstanding run - I hope you get to the 9.30 mark first as in my view you certainly deserve it. I agree with your statement (on another forum) that frequency of the memories plays far higher a role than uber tight ones. Even on single channel. You have inspired many past AMD benchers to return to the benching tables and give AMD another go and for that I thank you. Quote
subaruwrc Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 You have the 267*30 spi 32m don't you ? Quote
speed.fastest Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Very nice hard mod! Gigabyte 990FX SOC lol Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.