Stermy57 Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 IS really a big problem. Maybe a new gui Interface without command line option is the way! Quote
Moose83 Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 All want to ban PCMark 05 because of all the tweaks lol, and now all want to keep costum settings for Ucbench Dissallow all costum settings expect SSE settings and done Quote
Stermy57 Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 All want to ban PCMark 05 because of all the tweaks lol, and now all want to keep costum settings for Ucbench Dissallow all costum settings expect SSE settings and done Nono in my opinion pcmark 05 is THE BENCH Because overclocking and benchmark is not only change frequency and CPU voltage, win7 64bit and run bench like XTU >.< I love pcmark! But ucbench is different... Quote
Moose83 Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 It is differned, but also mostley OS Tweaking So why still keep on this threat count? Clear all lists with threat change, only leave auto scores and lets start from beginning Otherwise RIP Ucbench... Quote
CL3P20 Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 moose - Auto produces bug runs the most due to the core/thread formula Geni posted.. run only 2x thread sets no affinity set manually select SSE type Quote
Moose83 Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 Auto does not make bugged runs So what is ok to use for 4670k? 4,60,64 ok? Or 3 core, whats ok to use Quote
GENiEBEN Posted May 23, 2014 Author Posted May 23, 2014 Auto does not make bugged runs So what is ok to use for 4670k? 4,60,64 ok? Or 3 core, whats ok to use 1,4,64 4670K 1,3,60 tricore Quote
Moose83 Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 Is this safe Genie? No bugged runs with it? What about -ri Quote
GENiEBEN Posted May 23, 2014 Author Posted May 23, 2014 Is this safe Genie? No bugged runs with it? What about -ri Yes they are safe. Didn't try them with -ri. Quote
Moose83 Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 Thanks For 5core 1,5 and then? Still dont get it Quote
GENiEBEN Posted May 23, 2014 Author Posted May 23, 2014 Thanks For 5core 1,5 and then? Still dont get it 1,5,60 Quote
Moose83 Posted June 16, 2014 Posted June 16, 2014 Can we please remove this bench? People still put bugged scores on Where is Problem to dissallow threat stuff i dont get it Quote
GENiEBEN Posted June 17, 2014 Author Posted June 17, 2014 Can we please remove this bench? People still put bugged scores on Where is Problem to dissallow threat stuff i dont get it Because it was allowed in the first place. Quote
Moose83 Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 Yes and now no one knows whats good or not Whats good for 2c/4t Chip Genie? 1/2/60? Quote
GENiEBEN Posted June 17, 2014 Author Posted June 17, 2014 Yes and now no one knows whats good or not Whats good for 2c/4t Chip Genie? 1/2/60? 1/4/64. Quote
amirhosein Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 seriously Are not you going to find a replacement for this Bench?(for Global point i mean) Quote
Moose83 Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 Allmost all scores in 1 core ranking bugged, and nearly 90% scores of Topdog in HW points are bugged Disable it completly otherwise we one day have 50p cathegorys with bugged scores... Quote
ObscureParadox Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 I kind of agree that if a wrapper is being developed then all current scores should just be disabled and we start again with the benchmark. Sure there will be a lot of unhappy people but it is impossible to get a solution to suit everyone because most people will have a different idea on what needs to be done to resolve the matter. Surely the amount of work and effort that will have to go into getting every single submission checked and validated would simply be impossible with the amount of current submissions and more people adding submissions every day. That's the main reason why I personally think getting rid of what we have and adding a wrapper is the only way forward Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 Why not work directly with the author and avoid creating additional complications/bugs with a wrapper? I guess he could easily modify the ui to suit hwbot needs, then only that version would be allowed. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted June 17, 2014 Author Posted June 17, 2014 Why not work directly with the author and avoid creating additional complications/bugs with a wrapper?I guess he could easily modify the ui to suit hwbot needs, then only that version would be allowed. No he wouldn't, asked him over 2 years ago for a fix to my exploits, still nothing. Quote
Christian Ney Posted June 18, 2014 Posted June 18, 2014 Author has been contacted, he is working on a solution. Quote
delly Posted June 18, 2014 Posted June 18, 2014 Author has been contacted, he is working on a solution. excellent! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.