GENiEBEN Posted September 23, 2014 Author Share Posted September 23, 2014 So no point (pun intended:D) in running the old version, then? Why, keep using it, just leave threads on Auto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 Why, keep using it, just leave threads on Auto. Or manually select the proper amount? On a side note, if you bench a quad you're free to run 4 threads as many times as you want, right? Like, setting 4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4... as parameters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObscureParadox_3XS Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 Or manually select the proper amount? On a side note, if you bench a quad you're free to run 4 threads as many times as you want, right? Like, setting 4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4... as parameters. That was going to be the same question I was going to ask. But on a side note, auto also sometimes brings up bugged results due to thread count issues and other things right? So isn't that counter productive anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bones Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 All I can say at this point is why continue to use this bench since even with default settings it can give a bugged result? This one should be disabled period until the problem is fixed or you guys will still have work to do in the near future. Once the bench has been fixed, then allow subs with it again OR find a replacement - More difficult to do I'll admit but the issues with bugs and UCbench has turned it into a moderator's nightmare no matter which option is chosen. I would say see if it can be fixed before ditching it of course and that's probrably what would happen anyway and probrably the best choice..... If it can be fixed. That's just my viewpoint of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted September 25, 2014 Share Posted September 25, 2014 Or manually select the proper amount? On a side note, if you bench a quad you're free to run 4 threads as many times as you want, right? Like, setting 4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4... as parameters. That was going to be the same question I was going to ask. But on a side note, auto also sometimes brings up bugged results due to thread count issues and other things right? So isn't that counter productive anyway? Just leave the threads at auto , and only change the instruction set, you'll be good to go no matter what in most cases. That's because sometimes the benchmark can produce a bugged run even at default settings. To my understanding, setting 4,4,4,4,4,4 is illegal because you ignore the rest of the default cpu threads (1,2,3). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 (edited) Yup that's correct, I am moderating UCBench in the flight back (Emirates has internet): I am a generous god. Edited October 21, 2014 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bogd4n Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 So you are not planning in giving up at this bench. What is the future for this? Will another version be available?... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 no news on the new version, I will poke the dev again. It will be back for submission in 2015 with new rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.