Submission & member moderation

In my wPrime 32M scores it says: Celeron 420 score : wPrime 32m 1x CPU rank: 172nd out of thousands, good for 6.0 points for team total, but not personal total, as his 2x CPU submission earns more points. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/947396_stealth_wprime_32m_celeron_lga775_420_46sec_129ms E8600 score : wPrime 32m 2x CPU rank: 239th out of thousands, good for 6.0 points for team total, but not personal total, as his 1x CPU submission earns more points. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/956434_stealth_wprime_32m_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_13sec_837ms These are the only wPrime 32M submisions i get global points, both take from 6 points so only on…

hallo, you can put this CPU in your DB so as to receive a score? Thanks

3 cores active. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977898_sord_wprime_32m_phenom_ii_x2_555_be_11sec_297ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977899_sord_wprime_1024m_phenom_ii_x2_555_be_6min_6sec_984ms

Isn't this bench counting in WR rankings?..... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977500_hipro5_3dmark_2005_4x_radeon_hd_4890_56986_marks ...because it doesn't gives me any WR points....

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/974972_miahallen_wprime_1024m_xeon_x5667_2min_15sec_0ms I have reported this score and nothing happent till now, EXCEPT that is was SIMPLY "checked by a moderator" Is it FAIR a NEWLY SIXTH (6) core cpu be into FOURTH (4) cores category? DESPITE if the bench was done with 4 cores! I could bench my 975 CPU with TWO cores and get the 2 core WR in the 2 cores category OR bench it with ONE core and ALSO get the 1 core WR in 1 core category..... The above cpu MUST retern to SIXTH cores category - It doesn't matter if the bench was done with 1 or with 128 cores, it's category is the "SIXTH CORES CATEGORY" ......No?

Ref: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/974966_drimacus_superpi_core_i7_960_7sec_343ms It appears that this submission used my screen shot from the run below for validation. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/973311_raptor_x_superpi_core_i7_960_7sec_343ms At least he could have copied a Gigabyte result & not duplicated the Classified's bug BCLK, which always reports approximatly .5 MHz below the BIOS set point. I changed my screen name to Raptor-X on the main HWBOT submission site. That change does not appear to have propogated to the forums. I still am appearing as Raptor@XCPUs here. How do I get them in sync?

Are they? My most recent vantage runs wont go through. My chip is a retail chip and I posted a pic of the retail box. I'll post a pic of the chip too, I guess. what else should I do? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/975924_q56_monster_3dmark_vantage___performance_2x_geforce_gtx_295_41255_marks

Deleted. To be rebuild due to control character that I can not get rid of....

hi guys i have some scores with 920 uploaded and 2 of them got score imediately but another 2 are without a point whats wrong? here valis http://hwbot.org/community/submission/975193_westsider_pifast_core_i7_920_16.08_sec?tab=Info http://hwbot.org/community/submission/975183_westsider_superpi_core_i7_920_7sec_582ms

I've noticed that when the WR are shown for the above CPU my #1 ranking is not shown: "PowerToTheUsers holds the AMD SuperPi 32m record with his Opteron 275 90nm at 35min 20sec 310ms!" If you pull down the top 100 I am (OptyTrooper) correctly listed however. This seems to be the case in several of the 275 catagories i.e. #2 CPU-Z. I understand there are seperate rankings for 1x and 2x CPU's as in wPrime but I'm not listed there either unless you click on yop 100. http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/opteron_275_90nm?tab=2drankings#superpi_32m

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5667 Results are being catagorized as 6 core, but it's a quad core chip.

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/913375_gomeler_pcmark_2005_core_i7_860_24261_marks?tab=Info with the comment "start up limit" In the time it took to block the post he could have opened up the image and saw 211.393MB/s. Please correct this.

Please check http://hwbot.org/community/submission/973297_euronimous_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5570_5713_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/973624_zloy747_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5570_5525_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/973294_hardman_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5570_5462_marks Aquamark also http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_hd_5570 hardware sharing?

I'm a bit confused about this member- tiborrr I have already reported these scores but I see no action from moderator side! Are scores like this legit when you submit camera pictures instead of screenshots? Is this how team captain should show example for his teammates? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/758218_tiborrr_pifast_core_2_e8400_3.0ghz_17.41_sec http://hwbot.org/community/submission/695768_tiborrr_superpi_32m_core_2_e8400_3.0ghz_9min_21sec_390ms E6700: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/657820_tiborrr_superpi_core_2_e6700_2.66ghz_9sec_860ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/657822_tiborrr_superpi_32m_core_2_e6700_2.66ghz_10min_…

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/973732_memel_wprime_1024m_phenom_ii_x2_555_be_4min_37sec_843ms No RAM timings shown in the entry description itself or CPU-Z memory tab in the screenshot as required by the rules.

Can anybody check this ? The User zLOY747 bench in aquamark a sapphire and in Vantage than a Asus. http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/aquamark/rankings?hardware=radeon_hd_5570 http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/3dmark_vantage_-_performance/rankings?hardware=radeon_hd_5570 I think three man and two cards ...take a look at the clock (task)

Please check out this Super Pi 32M time and rank for the Sempron 64 3000+ Palermo core (Socket 754) The time shown in the image does not appear to match the time in the ranks. http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=78192&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg http://hwbot.org/community/submission/690232_powertotheusers_superpi_32m_sempron_64_3000_s754_palermo_28min_35sec_280ms

These two times do not appear to be Hexus PiFast ver 4.1 times. Would you please investigate and remove if appropriate? The times appear to be well out of the expected range for Hexus PiFast ver 4.1 run on the AMD Turion 64 ML-34 processor. The times screenshots do not show that they were run on Hexus Pi Fast ver 4.1. Here are the links to the times in question: http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/582045_klopcha_pifast_turion_64_ml_34_34.83_sec http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/816060_barracuda___pifast_turion_64_ml_34_39.95_sec Compare those times, and the clock speeds and voltages they were run with to the clock speeds and volta…

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/731706_riska_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_3870_17826_marks Wy is this not shown as gold and WR ?? There is no one higher than me?

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/888303_nzaneb_3dmark_2001_3x_geforce_gtx_285_91787_marks is listed in the 3x category that is however 2x GPU benched Windows XP can not 3x SLi see the Screen here: http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&cpu=&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=GeForce+GTX+285&numberOfVideocards=3&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=nzaneb&minScore=&maxScore=&disp…

Hi all, i want to post a result with G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ but he always say: Please enter your memory type. A known memory type is required for this benchmark. I don't find any name for this.

ello to everyone and good morning Please note that this member has posted a result from 165k registering as 171k http://hwbot.org/community/submission/553760_deathscyth_aquamark_radeon_x1900_xt_512mb_171159_marks ________ Host and design

My best SPi 32 score have no Global points. Rank and points. SuperPi 32m ranking: not your best submission for this ranking. #2. SuperPi 32m - 6min 45sec 734ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i5 670) 0.3 points My results #1. SuperPi 32m - 6min 38sec 280ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i7 980X @5861MHz) no points 966459 #2. SuperPi 32m - 6min 45sec 734ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i5 670) 0.3 points 871328 #3. SuperPi 32m - 7min 0sec 300ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i7 Extreme 965 @5387MHz) 14.9 + 9.2 points I understand 980X not allowed yet, but my i5 670 score is better than Extreme 965. …

I don t understand why this guy report my result "2010-02-24 22:23:35.0 - rbuass: manual online submission 2010-02-24 22:25:14.0 - (crew) Thor941: checked by a moderator () 2010-02-25 20:58:33.0 - Olesius: reported by user due to lack of validation (i think 2result submited by 1sys http://hwbot.org/community/submission/965929_guerreiro215_superpi_core_i5_670_6sec_516ms) I never share results with anybody... But i deleted the result, cause i just do one best... Unfortunably we have to report here, but please, delete to my profile please. Thanks

Hello, I'm a bit confused on the two Pentium 4 2.4Ghz Northwoods - A and B. I need help identifying the differences between the two. I think one runs at a 100fsb(Pentium A) and the other runs on 133fsb(Pentium B). The 2.4Ghz prescott and the 2.4Ghz HT types are easy enough to identify. When looking at my CPU-Z ID program what am I to look for to see the difference between the Pent.4 2.4Ghz(A)? and the Pent. 2.4Ghz (B)? to properly submit my scores in the correct category. I also have the ability to look on the cores itself, but the core is currently being benched. The top line on the core I vaguely remember looked like in this format 2.40GHZ/512/xxx/x.xx v …