Submission & member moderation

i am unsure here whats up with this score it was done with 1.55 it is the only version i have and was submited on line ok

I've been looking over the results for a cpu I have on my shelf that I may bench, and came across this anomality. CPU category and cpu-z doesn't match up, and same cpu-z version (1.45) reports different stats/names for the cpu for different benches done by this user. May this be an unlocked cpu (look at the multi in cpu-z verification) that confuses cpu-z? Hope a mod can look at these and make an educated opinion and answer me what is going on here. Sorry for the long link: http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=1046&userName=pepek&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Athlon+XP+2600%2B+Thoroughbred+%28210%29&…

In the benchmark info page it says "have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show 3Dmark score, 3Dmark subtest scores, 3Dmark settings, processor in CPU-Z, videocard in GPU-Z, unless if you provide a futuremark orb link" Does this mean we don't need a screenshot if we have a valid ORB link, or we just don't need the GPU-Z section if we have a valid ORB link? Thanks.

hey guys, i just got a notice one of my results was checked by a moderator because a user noticed i had no screenshot. it did have a screenshot at one time but something obviously happened with the database and now the screenshot just comes up blank. the problem is, i can't edit the result now that it has been 'checked by moderator' i assume. i would like to edit it and re-add the screenshot. result referred to... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771640 furthermore, why doesn't the link to the screenshot not actually link to where the screenshot was uploaded? instead, it simply links to the thumbnail version HWBot keeps on its record. before it …

Hi, Can somebody please tell me why my score of 29k ish has been deleted and why i was not informed as to why ? Cheers, Rich.

Is this a db error it's showing 2 in 16xpci-e and 1 in 16xpci=e And it's in the integrated chip version and on all runs both have gold cups? http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1300

I'm sitting on a 3dFX Voodoo 3000 card and was contemplating on running it through the benches. To see what to expect I looked up what others had done with this card... It seems like all submissions using the Voodoo 3000 and the Voodoo 2000 and the Matrox G200 are done with non-default settings. Further investigation revealed the bench (3dmark01) was run at z-buffer depth 16 instead of default 32 for all submissions. Big question will then be; Are we allowed to run benches at non-default settings with hardware that don't support the default settings? If so, I'm good to go and will run the benches, setting z buffer to 16 and tweaking what has to be tweaked. If …

Move this result to multiple cards: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576385 It's Voodoo 2 SLI!!! 2 cards! And this result from AMD Sempron 3000+ Palermo s754 to AMD Sempron 3000+ Palermo s939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500685 http://forum.purepc.pl/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=4208 this has been verified as correct by a moderator!!! WTF?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=801893 Why was this entry deleted? How do I insure that this will not happen again? I did not recieve an email notifacation of a problem.....

This may be not be the right place for it and I don't know exactly how to put it. I see that there are a couple of different categories for integrated videochips that are essentially identical. For example, there is a category "GMA i946GZ" and "GMA 3000". But the videocore of the i946GZ is a GMA 3000 so they are actually the same. This way you get a really mixed up view of the scores. Same goes for "82945G Integrated Graphics" and "GMA 950". One thought on this is that the 946GZ is limited in FSB to 800 so although the videocore is the same it might me unfair to compare them to Q965 and Q963. Also, I've noticed there are a lot of 945G scores in the 946GZ cate…

I am pissed my 3D06 WR with my HD3870 gfx is removed and the upload is altered to a HD3870X2 gfx i dont even own such a card wy is that?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731706

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745848 Result event log. date event user description 17 Jun 2008 03:40 created Cerbie manual online submission 17 Jun 2008 06:40 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (duron 1.3 is morgan.... not applebread. This processor is 1.8 (133x13.5).) 18 Jun 2008 02:09 reported DataNusse reported by user due to wrong hardware match (Move this score to the right category. Its a Appaloosa core in the scores. This category is Morgan (1.3Ghz). ) 19 Jun 2008 07:47 modified jmke manually modified by moderator (jmke) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:04 modified Cerbie manually modified by own…

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791652 10 Dec 2008 08:36 non default settings (crew) Woomack not ran at default settings because of hardware limitations () So what is the card missing to run 3dmark01/se? Will you be deleting all the 7200 scores now, I could understand if it was 05 or 06. Could someone please check this?

Hi all, I have been moderated some of my results, because of the lack of CPU-Z memory screen. This was done on small processors or graphic cards such as pentium 4 s478 or geforce 6200. I understand that when a rule is applied, all the components have to be treated equally. A rule is a rule and with Sarkozy in our country I know what I'm talking about... Just wanted to say that I found unfair that my scores have been deleted when others can keep their Wprime results only by the validation number. What means the validation number of Wprime? Does it refers to a rig? Where can I find the corresponding material used? Also, it sounds unfair for me that "s…

Hi, i have a question: is this screenshot valid for 3Dmark 06? since it got deleted without any notification, so i am a bit curious thanks for ur effords. Best wishes Kir4

It would appear as if i lost points from recent submissions for 3D01, 3D03, 3D05, 3D06, and two submissions for AM3. Could one of the mod crew please let me know why?

Cleaning out my old listings that aren't showing points, and came across a few results I cannot delete - could one of the mods help out, please? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=722657 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=761713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=761716 Thank you! - Tom :ws:

no cpuz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675056 no cpuz and incorrect time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718262 no memory cpuz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721506 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659059 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687495 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659060 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678135 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735633 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659062 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687485 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721505 no screen shot and invalid forumpost h…

EDIT.... forget it..... Vin

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696983 I'm wondering if perhaps Rich would explain what's wrong here, this looks very weird to my eyes. http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=5 ...here you can also see that the score is way to good for the HW anyway, 10s lower than other, similar scores:D

Please any Mod, can I fix this ??... was reported three times, the first on 11-11-2008 and so far still there. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791079 the screen's are: Not only has been reported in the right way, but I have done in the post Validated score still wrong? Let us know here , but this complaint was ignored Plese see this Thank you Sweet

Sorry mods...just reported a load of 8800GT 512MB Vantage scores. Some are just ridiculous. Some im not sure about in regard to PhysX but will let you guys make the decisions Also: an 8800GT 1024MB result: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=757651 no option to report score but no FM link or screeny. Score looks high for the clocks

Hey there, sorry to bother. But I'm trying to upload my X2 4000+ Brisbane wPrime score. when doing so, it says "Duplicate warning. You already have submitted a benchmark run with exactly the same properties. To prevent duplicates, we have not saved this entry. To view the duplicate result, click here." well, clicking there doesn't help, since there is no score shown. I don't have a wPrime 32m Score with this CPU yet. What should I do to get this fixed? Thanks for any advice!

i have a question, when with ORB all slots are busy and no extra online submissions are possible, is then a screenshot also valid??? With Cpu-Z , Gpu-Z and Memory settings and the screen with al scores and FPS, and Vantage set at "Performance". Like other Bench Programs ? Is this also valid ???

is there some way, how post result with URL to futuremark web? I benched in my cellar without web connection ...