-
Posts
514 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by bigblock990
-
The official HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC4: DDR4 thread.
bigblock990 replied to Lopata's topic in HWBOT Competitions
This is what I did aswell. Tried to position everything to show as much of the rendered scene as possible. I use a standard 1080p monitor, there just isn't enough room with the BM window plus all the required cpuz tabs. It really seems like people here are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill............ -
E8500 – PiFast. 0.2 HW?
bigblock990 replied to SArd's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Fixed by using the "recalculate ranking" button. -
Mythical tech - Core i3 7350K - 643 cb Cinebench - R15
bigblock990 replied to Mythical tech 's topic in Result Discussions
Didn't you read my post? I told you exactly what to buy https://www.crcindustries.com/products/qd-174-electronic-cleaner-11-wt-oz-05103.html -
Mythical tech - Core i3 7350K - 643 cb Cinebench - R15
bigblock990 replied to Mythical tech 's topic in Result Discussions
CC means dead slot, or dead ram stick. Seems you have determined its the inside slot and not a ram stick. You can use CRC QD electronics cleaner (or similar) and do a thorough cleaning of the cpu socket, and the dimm slots. Make sure to dry completely afterwords. If that doesn't fix it, then time for a new mobo. -
The official BenchMate support thread
bigblock990 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in Benchmark software
Don't see an issue there, larger result window still less space than multiple cpuz windows Can you list out the info you use for moderation, that is currently missing from the benchmate result window? Maybe its possible in the future for mat to add this info. -
The official BenchMate support thread
bigblock990 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in Benchmark software
@_mat_ Is it possible for BM to detect and display ES cpu? The pic Allen shared above is a 7740x ES cpu. Also is it possible to add bclk x multi, "nb freq" (cache/mesh), and command rate for mem timings to the result window? If this info can be added then maybe in the future we can get rid of the cpuz tabs requirements. -
bigblock990 - Core i3 7350K @ 6783MHz - 771 cb Cinebench - R15
bigblock990 replied to Noxinite's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks everyone! @unityofsaints You are missing the point. Benchmate is the the way forward. If we require all benches to have a separate category "with benchmate" then what is the point of staying on hwbot? It would make WAY more sense for matt to create his own database, and leave hwbot behind. Also you are incorrect about win10. All skylake and newer intel platforms are legal on any OS with or without benchmate. -
Geekbench 4 result not possible
bigblock990 replied to Ace123's topic in Submission & member moderation
Nothing to see here. Both gb3/4 get a boost depending of win10 version. Same shakeup happened in gb3 18c ranking recently. -
Benchmate 10.6.8 is out!! NO MORE SUPPORT FOR GEEKBENCHES!!
bigblock990 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in HWBOT News
-
Toppc - DDR4 SDRAM - 3008.4 MHz Memory Frequency
bigblock990 replied to Radi's topic in Result Discussions
Killer! -
Your best bet is to join an active team, and hope someone has one they will sell. I searched for ~1.5yr, then got lucky and was able to buy one from a teammate. I then subsequently sold it to another teammate about a year later. Usually rare items like this are always offered to team members first before listed at the forums. I would recommend you look into building a window a/c water chiller setup. Its cheaper, and you can build one immediately instead of waiting for an SS. Done correctly you can get -25-30c coolant temps. For reference the small SS I had ($400) only did like -28c idle on 8700k.
-
Benchmate 10.6.8 is out!! NO MORE SUPPORT FOR GEEKBENCHES!!
bigblock990 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in HWBOT News
I'm glad you are here now, I really hope a solution can be found by all the parties working together. Even though I initially called to remove geekbench from hwbot, I would rather see it stay. I also really like benchmate, and want to see geekbench remain supported there. However I do feel the need to point something out. You have 5 posts total between both your new account and 11yr old account. To me this clearly indicates that you actually weren't a part of this community. If you had been prior to today, you wouldn't have been surprised by the comments at all. Us benchers are small and very passionate community. Saying that @_mat_ is an active and valuable member here is a huge understatement. So it didn't surprise me one bit to see the reaction this thread has caused. Again I really hope you decide to stick around, and that in the future this "incident" can be considered water under the bridge. -
Splave - Core i3 7350K @ 6733MHz - 768 cb Cinebench - R15
bigblock990 replied to Noxinite's topic in Result Discussions
Great job as always -
Benchmate 10.6.8 is out!! NO MORE SUPPORT FOR GEEKBENCHES!!
bigblock990 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in HWBOT News
Sad news for sure that the geekbench dev is behaving this way. Unfortunately I already purchased gb5 key, otherwise after hearing this I for sure wouldn't be. I also purchased both gb3 and gb4 keys previously. I agree with Mr Scott above, who else even buys a geek key except for benchers? He literally is killing his market off. +1 from me for completely removing geekbench from hwbot. In other news, Thanks again to Mat for keeping up the great work!!! -
This thread can be closed and moved. Thanks!
-
Some of you guys/girls/transgenders are all talk.
bigblock990 replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Software and Apps
I didn't know Matt had setup a donation page until seeing this thread. Don't have patreon account, so donated via paypal. Thanks for all the hard work Matt!! -
rtsurfer - GeForce GTX 580 - 85742 marks 3DMark05
bigblock990 replied to mllrkllr88's topic in Result Discussions
Good job! -
The official BenchMate support thread
bigblock990 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in Benchmark software
This is not gpupi problem, its nvidia driver "feature". Cuda is compute so the driver sets p2 instead of p0, which results in full core clocks but lower mem clocks.