Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TaPaKaH

Members
  • Posts

    3675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Everything posted by TaPaKaH

  1. prolly just low cache + bad tweaks
  2. waiting for a comment from Massman that this is NOT to make money...
  3. isn't everything below CL6 pure BS on Ivy?
  4. M.Bacon is available, I reckon
  5. ...or else what?
  6. if yes, that might induce people breaking into their local Chinese embassies in order to bench
  7. impressive chip, how many did you try?
  8. Lack of motivation is not a legit excuse for an offense. For example, I doubt that if I now go out and murder a random pedestrian I will be able to get away with only 1 month of public service even if I manage to prove that the crime was pointless. Besides, you have just mentioned in the last line of your previous post that hwbot no longer accepts mutual argumentation in questions of hardware sharing, so what "solid proof" made hwbot actually believe it was not a coordinated result sharing scheme?
  9. Why does the "background" matter? An accidental/uninentional score sharing is still score sharing. I seem to be not alone who finds it funny how in some situations hwbot staff bother with seeking for/considering penalty softening arguments like with John Lam (oh, he had a close score himself, oh, he is close to hwbot sponsors, oh, he is actually an experienced bencher) while in others, like with 12 and Diabolo, one (accidentally?) shared pair of screenshots was enough to instantly issue 1 year ban for BOTH guys without long discussion/hesitation.
  10. I had the same, 1.6 set was around 1.35 actual
  11. unless I sell, I like my boards dirrrrrty
  12. anyone cares to explain the difference between these three? also, why is John Lam given 1 month penalty, which is not even on the list of "available" penalty types?
  13. lol, if you have the 2400C8 version of RipjawsZ every board will give you an excellent result
  14. Try higher SA voltage, it usually makes higher Vdimm values stable if you're looking to get 1300 8-11-x stable. As for 2000C9 Tridents - they vary a lot both in terms of IC (can be PSC, BBSE or Hypers) and in terms of IC quality. 1190 8-10-7 isn't particularly a good result for BBSE version, decent samples should do 1250 8-10-7 given enough voltage.
  15. isn't every single package in the US remotely trackable?
  16. everyone is soo optimistic hoping their s2011 chip will do 5.6-5.8 :D
  17. if those are 2400C11s - good luck hitting spec
  18. You not, but there are always enthusiasts on the side who you can assign all the "dirty" work to
  19. They can just make the competition last 2 hrs, but announce it 3 months in advance.
  20. I don't like this idea.On most (if not all) outer forums you have to have special privileges to be able to see the ad in full (not everyone has their own site) so most of the time the negotiations will be made just via PM on hwbot forums. If that is to happen anyway, why not allow people post their ads here so there's at least some track of "who promised what to who" in case of possible issues?
×
×
  • Create New...