I.nfraR.ed

your turn show me your backups

I hit 6.9+ GHz valid with my second chip and sold for 400euro. It was also a very good 3D chip. Now I understand it was a bit silly low price. It sold ~10 min after I posted the thread and took me more to write the text in the thread, lol.

For quite some time the site is skewing photos' aspect ratio on the submission pages. I've not tested it thoroughly and don't know the reason, but I think it happens when more than one pictures are uploaded.

Might be a stupid question, but how to enable vcore higher than 1.85V on UP7? I'm running F4 bios, single bios switch enabled. I don't see any option in bios to enable extreme voltage or some sort of jumper.

I think it had been mentioned before, but here it goes again. There's a problem with editing scores in some cases. For example I have this recent result with XP-M 2800+, Pi 1M - 34.069s. I entered [43] . [069], so hwbot transformed it to 43sec 69ms. Now I tried to edit the score and upload some pictures, hit save and the site transformed it to 43sec 690ms. Had to edit it again and enter 069.

And please remove .NET 4 requirement, I'm sure you'll take care of that .

Did that...yesterday .

It is missing when submitting an entry for competitions, which is a bug, I think. Otherwise I've always liked that feature. There's a high chance you want to submit several scores with a given hardware with similar settings after a bench session , so it really saves a lot of time.

Yes, best Deneb I've ever had and finally reached 7GHz Need to rerun this with better efficiency.

I didn't see a difference with different values as well and I usually use 640.

Did that as well, but it seems that the moon and the sun are not properly aligned for me

Yes, I know. Tried all 64 threads, as well some combinations, but can't get such a boost. Even tried the same combinations used in the top-5 submissions for K7. First I thought it might be the ucbench version, but there's one submission with the latest one, too.

I don't get how some results have such a huge boost in one of the calculations. Tried all combinations from the leading K7 scores with my XP-M 2500+ and none of them gave me such a big difference. Also tried some different ones. Is it sure this behavior is not due to highly unstable cpu or it's just a lucky run?

If you search the database, you can see validations made with Sempron, as high as 1000MHz :woot:

Yep, really nice. What about 933 6-6-6-18 32M?

Nice one, but not enough

Looks like BFG 9800GT OCX to me. Some Gainward models have separate heatsink as well.

Well, don't expect much more. Need subzero on the cpu to beat Turrican.

Yeah. From other stages I can only participate in AGP, then I'll have to watch until the end of the comp. The tight schedule is kinda cool, but on the other hand it'll keep busy only the guys who have all kind of hardware.

You can find them in Nature Try N-DL-LL-DH-LH-CH-CL

I can always boot from bios. Performance-wise it's just a tad faster and you get a slight hit in max stable mem freq - around 5MHz or maybe even less. IIRC, my Mushkin Level II does 275 CL1.5 vs 280 CL2.

Wish my SD that did 3.3GHz on water was still alive. Don't know why you can't run CL1.5, I can do it with all BH5/BH-6/UTT I have.

Yep, I still don't understand how this is called "tweak". You directly mess with the way benchmark is meant to run, in other words - change the calculation. How on earth an (almost) empty file is comparable to the original .rtf which those who don't "tweak" use... Guys who defend these "tweaks", please have some dignity and look farther than your nose. There are a lot ot capable guys, who can figure out those "tweaks", but they just don't see the point.

Damn, I thought it ends today and was in a hurry to produce a score...

That is fine, but there's no guarantee it will be a good LN2 chip. I had 1.32+V chip that did exactly the same as 1.26V (6.9GHz) and two others stopped at 6.6GHz. There are other similar examples in this thread.