Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

max1024

Members
  • Posts

    447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by max1024

  1. Wow ALL in ONE tool ))) Great
  2. PM send
  3. Real HW-H@rdcore! and circuit design madness LOL =)))
  4. It's horrible. Make normal wallpaper and not those that are made in Word With a cassette tape recorder is much better Some problems at the start, why did not anyone check everything in advance?
  5. Congrats to TiN and his magic Nesting Doll
  6. General Question: Question about description of the 1-st stage. "Round 1 of the Old School is Best School contest is all about the classic Socket 7 which harks back to 1997. This means benching with Intel P5 Pentium MMX and AMD K6 architecture processors. All CPUs however must be manufactured using the 0.35 micron fabrication process." As i rigth understand, for P5 Microarchitecture fits processors Pentium NON MMX and with MMX on tech process 0.35 mc. Need to fix description "with Intel P5 Pentium MMX and" -> "with any Intel P5 Pentium and" to prevent misunderstanding.
  7. I think you have a quarter or half of all OSBS HW for all years )) or even whole
  8. What I think about the Old school. I have the main association of OSBS with the legendary Hardware, which GF256 is. MX400/200 is generally the next generation at 1-st, moreover, it is poor quality of GF2U - another words trash in my opinion. When last years, among other stages of OSBS, there was a 3DFX v5 video card competition, then all still participated, although at a cost it is obviously more expensive than pair GF256. As for me gf256 is the same rarest thing as mobile A64 S754 Newark core, in our region it is hard to find 99% of HW. I do not understand the idea and the concept of last two modern OSBS at all, in the first championships it was, and now the administration gave this project to the mercy, but as a result, some opinions are listened to and executed by them, others are not taken into account at all. What is the main aidea? Overclocking for overclocking or overclocking interesting HW? It wil lbe better then OSBS expert like Antinomy and other from administration which is not perticipated in OSBS would come up with interesting and well-structured tasks that would become available for everyone and showed to all in one time.
  9. Think not in this season. TASOS I have a proposal for ROUND 5 - Socket 754 (2003) (No adapters allowed) add another limitation - only desktop cpu, not mobile S754. In Old School is Best School [2016] in stage 5 was S754 and majority used mobile version of cpu, lets this year desktop. Mobile for mobile (notebooks) desktop for desktop motherboards. As my personal opintion I do not like when used mobile version of cpu on non specialised motherboards it is "not usual usage".
  10. Merry Xm@s !!!
  11. and so on... and so on...
  12. Dead Things Boring, as the last time all take AMD DX-5 133Mhz and overclock it to 200 It happened before... Mendocino 433? wPrime 32M full-out (multi-slot OK) - only - it is all about alone ABIT BP6? Strange choice. A - is interesting, but B, why Intel? Lets do with A cpu, but non PCM Benchmark. C - there is no multiSocket AMD K6-systems in the World. Think it's ok in general, but remark - RIMM memory frequency only on S423, not 478. The worst offer imho. S754 it overclocked practically in every competition with M64 4000+ Turion never been Oldschool it's mobile cpu.
  13. Aquamark3 is BAD aidea, it have some errors with cyrylic vercson of Windows. By default save path ... Рабочий Ñтоли (Eng Desktop), so it can't give the result. think AMD K8 - 'Windsor' will be end of OSiBS HW. For AMD lowers and K6 core interesting to take K6 without prefix - Silmly first K6 - 166-300 mhz "Little Foot (model 7) "
  14. Remarc on Socket3 besides POD and amd dx5 you can use:1. Texas Instruments up to 100Mhz, 2. UMC 80486, 3. IT's ST up to 100mhz, 4. IBM, 5. Cyrix, 6. AMD A80486DX4 - think it will be enough
  15. but it is good pain )) IT is possible to install w2k and ever XP on socket3, 4 so on. Socket4 is very interesting socket. In HWBOT DB there is no Peinium 66 results, only few P-60. But it possible to find ever Ovedrive120/133 on socket4, but there is also no any results this cpu in DB. There a lot of chipset for S-4: Intel, SiS, OPTi ... and think one more chipset. So we need to filed in all holes in HWBD. ok SLI V2 1024@16 bit in memory of first SLi Not slower then in 2015 we try to bench Super pi 32M on Socket3 is about 35-36 hours it is real OSBS =) Sounds good ))
  16. A have spent some time and came up with a couple of ideas: -=CPU Tests=- Super Pi 1M on Socket3 (Pentium Overdrive and AMD DX5 are NOT allowed). Prepare for the oldest true Showtime Wprime32 on Socket8 CPU’a (1-8 CPU’s in system allowed). “Multiple Soket8 CPU madness†PiFast on Socket4 CPU’s. “First true Pentium Contest†SuperPi 1M/32M Socket462 on AMD Thunderbird Core. “Last ceramic AMD acceleration†Max Frequency on Slot 1 Pentium II on Klamath Core. “Push the slowest Pentium II to the Sky†Cinebench 2003 on Slot 1 on Pentium III Katmai Core. “Slowest Pentium III kickdown†-=Video cards tests=- 3Dmark2001 (16 bit mode) - on Voodoo2 (single or SLI mode) on Intel CPU on Socket5/7 (AMD K6 1-3 NOT allowed) “Back to the roots of SLI†3DMark2001 - on Voodoo3 on Intel CPU on Socket5/7 (AMD K6 1-3 NOT allowed) “Voodoo 5 Goodbuy†3DMark2000 – GeForce256 + IDT WinChip’s CPU “Crazy stuff†3Dmark2001SE - PowerVR Kyro II + Pentium3 Coppermine Core Slot1 “In memory of PowerVR†3DMark99 - ATi Radeon 7000 Series + S370 (only VIA CPU are allowed) "RadeVia =)" And aslo Mendocino, Pluto, Orion cores and so on. Think 5 stages with 2 cpu and 1 3D tests in each Round will be enough. Possibly do not use cpu with integred memory controllers, all above S370 and S462, there a lot of interesting HW in range of Slot3-462.
  17. What ??? It is NOT oldschool, It is SERVER parts! Once again ? and once, why? For the last years of OSiBS we overclock so many times: AMD-K6, S462, S-939, S771/775 and modern... which is not oldschool imho. Think it will be Enough. last Old School I do not participate, Quadro+LGA771 makes me angry. And I propose to change the conception of OSiBS: - Do not take SOCKET as criterian, lets take cores, for example S462 all time all used fastest Barton and mobile, lets take Thunderbird core or Palomino it also S462. It will be more useful for filling the HWBot database which is luck of thise results. Also it takes SLOT 1, lets take the first and slowlest core - Klamath and overclock it! Thing it is more interesting then overclock top P2-450. Think the aidea is clear. ! Multithreaded benchmarks on True OSiBS. Wprime32 on: 1.Socket8 CPU - there is opportunity to use from 2 to 8!! Pentium Pro. 2. Socket5/7 - is also something fresh i think. ! Real OLD HW Socket 3 lets try 80486 family CPU's: Mystic Cyrix or ordinary Intel DX's or AMD DX4 (NOT DX5 which it all used for previous OSiBS (pi32 test)) ! Socket4 ! wery hard and wery interesting socket, there are about 3-4 different chipsets on this socket and about 3 cpu's. ! S370, is not only Taulatin core lets try Cyrix/IBM, IDT winChip 1/2, VIA. think old shchool si something not higher then S-939 and 478, above is legasy.
×
×
  • Create New...