-
Posts
447 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by max1024
-
now 22 million views ))))
-
Splave - Xeon W-3175X @ 5700MHz - 16sec 528ms wPrime - 1024m
max1024 replied to flanker's topic in Result Discussions
Impressive!!! What was the power consumption ? -
Cib R20 works fine on Win7 x64 SP1 and Win10 x64 too. Download aviable from there: https://www.guru3d.com/files-get/download-maxon-cinebench,1.html https://www.techpowerup.com/download/maxon-cinebench/ Maybe immediately to the battle for points? Why wait, the developer checked.
-
What happened? What is the reason and how to get it back?
-
You do not uderstand us, we mean to see our followers on maim HWBOT.org site What to do in this case ? I have a one follower oops.
-
Aslo very intetesting. Owner must be know who is followed him. How to see it?
-
PM on #32: 2x512MB Corsair 3200C2. Asking 10 Euros + shipping
-
Add please in CPU Socket8 section - six Pentium Pro processors (and POD333 to). I’m going to make benchmarks soon and want to post the results, but all Pentium Pro processors have 1, 2, 4... and 8 in the database at once. Example: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_pro_200mhz_256kb/ There are no choose of 6 physical processors. I want to ask to add the number of processors 6 for the Pentium Pro on Sok8 and P2Overdrive 333Mhz (Socket8) for all models (may be instead of 3). I think it will be interesting for many people to compare the performance of such HW. My validation of my ALR 6x Revolution with 6 PPro. http://valid.x86.fr/xwi7wv
-
Rauf - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti - 230045 marks 3DMark2001 SE
max1024 replied to techjesse's topic in Result Discussions
New WR!!! -
rsannino - Core i9 9900K @ 7500MHz - 8sec 390ms PiFast
max1024 replied to safedisk's topic in Result Discussions
1-st-Fisrst all the First ))) -
This is a provocation LOL!
-
Frequency detection bug with old Socket 5 CPUs
max1024 replied to Strunkenbold's topic in HWBOT News
I took two days (do not look at the language barrier, it exists I know it, although not all recognize this) to understand everything and I can say that I completely agree with everything written above Strunkenbold. This topic can be discuss endlessly, but it is need to Do something. I do not know who now runs HWBOT, but I would like it to be independent people who are not in any teams. Either they are, but do not have any complaints from all users. It would be good to strengthen cultural discipline as well, open off against insults within this forum and start by bringing the rules for tests into order. This problem about the error in CPU-Z showed that it’s do not have to hurry to press the "Delete" button. For very old processors with a free multiplier, CPU-Z will never determine what kind of model it is, the multiplier can also be erroneous, but often (though not always) the final clock frequency is displayed correctly. The degree of trust is also important, I do not think that most users want to deceive others, in the first place they deceive themselves. To start moving forward I propose to create a separate page on the forum and there to discuss problematic issues. Here is my example. Video cards that do not support 16-bit color get points in 3DMark2001 SE. Look for an example on Voodoo3 3000 AGP. My suggestion is to make an exception for this test for this test, since it is not physically possible to pass the test in 32-bit color, but leave the rest of the rules unchanged.