max1024

My Congratulations GRIFF! Think, it is not The End of this CPU LOL ))) It is Golden CPU produced 50 week 2004 year, which I have tested last week, like this https://www.ebay.com/itm/Gold-Pentium-MMX-200-Mhz-SL27J-binned-by-Max1024-batch-L4500332-0080/323949385082

Thanks )) need fix my SS and get some more lol +=)

some processors are available for purchase here?

I was fortunate enough to find in 2019 thirty ! brand-new, never-used retro processors Pentium MMX 200 Mhz, which also have a very fresh production date at the end of 2004 Below is a story about this link. https://translate.google.by/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Foverclockers.ru%2Flab%2Fshow%2F99739%2Fretrokloking-silikonovaya-lotereya

Strong Score Bro ?

Congratulations !!! Number One!

KRUTO!!!

1366 platform and 1st place with RTX 2060 Super - it is exactly Super )))

I don’t understand why here some overclockers oppose the use of Geekbench 5? I read the discussion and realized that the benchmark manufacturer did not want cooperation with the author of Benchmate. If the reason is only this, then this is his (manufacturer's right). I can’t find out what's wrong with breaking the rules? The benchmark itself is made by the commander of experienced programmers, previous versions have worked well, I see no reason not to use the 5th version. And with Benchmate, it’s not so simple, it doesn’t work for old systems starting with Windows 98 and higher, the stability of its work is also not always adequate. I pay tribute to the efforts and enthusiasm of _Mat_, but in my opinion it is impossible to keep up with all the innovations and new benchmarks coming out and updated with old ones, here need a team of developers IMHO. And what will happen if _Mat_ ceases to be engaged in Benchmate? Support will stop and everything will freeze. In my opinion, it is easier and more reliable, from a long-term perspective, to use serial products of development companies that are professionally engaged in the production of benchmarks. And since I started to write all this, I want to add that the number of benchmarks used has long reached too much and I personally would have removed some benchmarks (those that are in the beta state, such as BRENNAN, SHZO, SPEEDSYS, etc.) they passed, the frequency of use is also minimal. All of the above is personally my opinion based on more than 10 years of overclocking experience, your opinion may be different from mine.

I have a question about "Geekbench 5". I bought Geekbench 5, did some tests, I liked this benchmark. I tried to upload the results to hwbot, but it’s bad, on the benchmark page itself there is a button that says “GEEKBENCH5 - MULTI CORE (BETA)”, but in fact only GEEKBENCH 5 - WITH BENCHMATE benchmark. See for yourself. Please add another GEEKBENCH 5 without BENCHMATE, as was done for previous versions.

Nice board set ))

Push more )) for the 3d place ;-)

Very cool =) Good CPU ))

Cool!!! and Cold )))

Well Done Mr.GriFF !!! #1 ?

MiNE GOD! 6GHZ!!!

It is necessary to check on own experience lol.

MrGenius Ths for your thoughts ? Some people have already tried to make friends with SL7QB and G31-M4 board, but each time on the screen saw this message: "The Max Power of CPU is over 95W. Prepare to shut down………". I don’t have board yet and I can’t check, but I think it's possible to get around this protection. If you are able to find it before me, write here what you did.

Translated via G00gle

Super Krut!!

Ha-ha, if you want know something about IBM Pentium IV clcick this my new story Translated via Google

I have the same pr0blem

I WANT IT!

Rules => https://hwbot.org/news/9946_application_94_rules/

And I consider FB-dimm to be a separate standard that does not overlap with DDR2. All previous years and the editors of HWBOT, this truth did not cause questions. How does it make sense to raise this issue if it has already been resolved before us? There are a lot of other issues that need to be resolved, at least, to keep me up, which will be of real benefit to all.