TASOS

I have an Asus A7N8X and an Abit NF7-S I am only interested in the DFI NF-II Ultra. I'll send you a pm

I would be interested in a mini bundle for socket A (board+cpu+mem+vga)

Does your chip really need such voltage for spi32M ? Change your HT to 4x

Average chip , i'm ready to junk it.

very good cpu and score !!!

Your 3D numbers are good , but you are low on Physics score and that results to a 1000 marks lower score.

Well done , good score !

I'm sure there could be an exception for us hwbot fans. After all , we are probably talking about a minor coding modification.

It's very usefull to see the real fps during the benchmark run ... and NOT when finished.

@FM_Jarnis Is it possible to slightly mod , the most beloved Futuremark benchmark , just to show , the on screen FPS over 999. I assume it's only a minor coding modification. Is it doable ?

Bump. Any news about the 6core (8core) matter ??? and also about the 7870 ?

Take out of your calculations ALL the engineering samples ... and then look at your stats again.

There's even a much more easy move to do. Simply leave-out the 8cores and replace them with the 6cores. This way , there are plenty of options for hardware , including the 6core Haswell-E models

For all stages and not for a particular one , it would be nice to have more hardware options , than the obligatory submissions. Meaning that , a poor team with no resources , that doesnt have a superWoW Haswell-E ... CAN STILL compete with a 6core cpu , even with a SandyBridge-E So , 4 cpu categories permitted but only 3 submissions are required. The same should apply for the rest of the stages too. Give a bit more hardware options.

Why did you left-out the 6core cpu's from both stage2 and stage4 ??? Please add them. Also , i agree about adding 7870 in stage3. Thanks

Usefull article. Thank you.

That's a good point.

Just for the history Can you show us the entries of about 30sec before the deadline time ? Can you show us even the deleted entries ?

Is it a fault of the people who organized this event or the people who commited to make it happen ? I dont really know. But the result is ... Shame and lame. People with a cause on their mind will always find ways to spoil the true spirit of a competition. Sorry Hwbot ... but you dont deserve this kind of image given. Sometimes it's better to stop an error beeing ... than waiting for it to end.

So ... stage1 is only for X99 boards and single vga stage2 is only for Z97 boards and no limit on vga's ?

Very good job done and usefull data given. Thanks

Now that you said so , it must be it. I didnt recall , that there was a decision about removing those kind of points.

Trying to figure-out why my team lost about 300 points since yesterday. I cant find something obvious. Can somebody from hwbot staff , have a look ?

Are we expecting a fix for this issue ? Something quick ?

Perhaps he miscalculated the scale. 0.2 is not normal , but 0.02 is. Anyway ... actually there is a difference in voltages. Set in bios Vcore=1.36 Vdimm=1.80 Read in bios (MIT health screen) Vcore=1.368 Vdimm=1.812 Read in Windows (Tweak Launcer B14.0916) Vcore=1.359 Vdimm=1.80 Measured in reading points (with multimeter) Vcore=1.379 Vdimm=1.82