-
Posts
393 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Alan_Alberino
-
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Now 780Ti competes in globals against Titan X Pascal, so it's the same than now, I think it's the best way to separe graphics card without changing too much the actual system and making a complicated system with ROPs or similar things that lot of new users don't know and will complicate the understanding of HWBOT rankings -
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Now 780Ti competes in globals against Titan X Pascal, so it's the same than now, I think it's the best way to separe graphics card without changing too much the actual system and making a complicated system without ROPs or similar things that lot of new users don't know and will complicate the understanding of HWBOT rankings -
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Launch price would always be the price for the card for the ranking, even if it drops later, that's why I said launch price and not actual price... -
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
It's the price that AMD or Nvidia says when they launch the card... Nvidia said 700 dollars for GTX 1080 FE, that's the price to consider for every GTX 1080 in rankings... AMD said U$S 240 for RX 480 so that's the price for every RX 480 in rankings... -
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
I have a strange idea but it's based on the big problems of Titans: Price... What about making launch price based categories? I say launch price because then they go lower after some time and it would be a mess to control that... I say something like: - Below 250 USD - 250 to 499 USD - 500 to 749 USD - Above 750 USD 1080Ti will possibly be priced at more than 750 USD since GTX 1080 FE price was 700 USD, so it will be in the same category than Titan X Pascal, and also in same performance category... EDIT: Maybe to not make so much changes to actual systems and not give global points to low end cards (below 250 USD) since like some said, it won't be really global, make two big categories: Under U$S 750 and above U$S 750 (This price obviously can be changed but it's the price between GTX 1080 and possible GTX 1080Ti Price) -
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Old GPUs don't give globals now, only last generations mid-high or high end cards give GP, so I think it's not necessary to include them... Maybe 10 categories divided to include from 4-way high end till X60 cards, cards slower than gtx x60 or AMD equivalent don't give globals now so I don't see a reason to include them in new system... Maybe 9 categories + a big categorie with ALL lower cards than actual gen GTX x60 cards to include all the others, but not more than that... -
Yeah, stripped win 10 x32 is the best for XTU, also tight your mems as max as possible, mems are equal important as CPU in that particular bench
-
I think I said it in a earlier post but I want to make a separate comment about this... I think 15 GP, 40 HP and 25CP aren't well distributed, 15 GP maybe is too low in comparision with the amount of the other points, I think they should be 20 GP slots at least, maybe 25 GP Slots since lot of people have dual-core and quad-core CPU now, and maybe even a X99 CPU and/or a high end GPU, and could probably fill 20/25 slots. Also, who in the earth enters 25 competitions in a year? I think less than 50 people of the thousands of users that HWBOT has, 25 CP slots is totally unnecesary from my point of view... About 40 hardware points, you need some years at HWBOT to achieve 40 good scores that give decent points, I think 30 would be fine so new users can be a little bit more competitive... Resuming, I would make 20/25 Global Point Slots, 30 Hardware Point Slots, and 10/15 Competition Point slots
-
barti27 - Core i3 6320 @ 4020MHz - 740 marks XTU
Alan_Alberino replied to speed.fastest's topic in Result Discussions
Try with W10, I know lot of people got better scores on w8.1 but in my case with i3-6100 I was getting constantly 695 on W8.1, and got 697 (Hardware #1) at first run on W10 x32... Also do not use last XTU version, scores a bit lower on i3s as far as I know -
How to fix the rankings :)
Alan_Alberino replied to Rauf's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Maybe make something like OC-Esports divisions? Divide hardware in divisions and update them each time new GPU series release -
HeartOfDarkness - DDR4 SDRAM - 31328 marks MaxxMem
Alan_Alberino replied to GtiJason's topic in Result Discussions
Score is 549.2, not 31328... -
Intel XTU Benchmark Validation possible on AMD?
Alan_Alberino replied to matrixus's topic in HWBOT Competitions
XTU is only for Intel plattforms... Seems that HWBOT it's so crazy to put XTU everywhere that they don't think about nothing, just put it there without even checking where they are putting it... -
Why was my score deleted? http://hwbot.org/submission/3278735_ I uploaded system score, it was fine In case it's because the bench was wrong, every score of the round should be deleted... EDIT: Got this score, its ok?
-
Hi, I would like to know the rules for each bench in this division. For example. what test is the score we have to submit in PerformanceTest? It gives many results...
-
Multiple OS installations on a single drive?
Alan_Alberino replied to GeorgeStorm's topic in Benchmark software
Yeah, they didn't cause problems to the others. -
Multiple OS installations on a single drive?
Alan_Alberino replied to GeorgeStorm's topic in Benchmark software
I always used three OS per HDD/SSD without problem.