Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Alan_Alberino

Members
  • Posts

    401
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alan_Alberino

  1. Yeah, when you submit many scores in short time, only best remains in that link
  2. Great, was an interesting bench, scaled with mems, scaled with cpu... Hope they can fix it and have it again.
  3. New HWBOT x265 version incoming? It would be great to have something notticeable in the benchmark window to show that it's the new version (to distingue it from old version easilly), + file verification of course...
  4. Great finding Splave... Guy banned, but what to do with benchs? There are at least 3 bugged benchs (x265 1080p, x265 4k, and hwbot prime) giving globals... Maybe it's notticeable on top scores but what happens with scores that don't appear on front page? Like watercooled tweaked runs that maybe no one sees?
  5. Yep, only Asrock supports more BCLKs within 102,9375 and 103...
  6. No problem with X299 Gaming 9, i9-7900X, and 1080Ti running Catzilla neither on W7 or W10 here... Installed normally and could use my key without any problem... W10 was installed right on x299, W7 was used first on z170 and then put the SSD on X299.. W10 1440p: Alan_Alberino`s Catzilla - 1440p score: 24062 marks with a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti W7 720P: Alan_Alberino`s Catzilla - 720p score: 64180 marks with a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti P.D: Ignore efficiency, I know it isn't the best
  7. Correct submission is 2000.1, not 4000, submit as CPU-Z reading... Fix it
  8. Hi, I uploaded some scores on Engineering Sample i9-7900X, sent some PMs two weeks ago to some HWBOT people but no answer. Want that points, and also have access to another ES so please change my league. Thanks! Alan .
  9. I think you need 3 months from register to see it, that anyway I see they already past since long time ago if you registered in December...
  10. Didn't rerun enough ^^ Should be getting constant 697s and 698s with good settings... I also need to infinite rerun, was getting those constant 697s and 698s but didn't rerun enough...
  11. http://picx.xfastest.com/nickshih/asrock/AFDSetup(v3.0.92.1).rar Boot at 102,9375 from bios and use that AFD to set 102,97XX (The last one before 103) Clockgen divider 12 , pll ort =32 , clockgen voltage 3.6 (safe limit) , cold bug killer 1.8 , vccpll 2.5 3866x102,9375 mems 12-12-12-28 220 1T 49/50 6/6 should give you 698 with good OS
  12. Don't care about CPU multiplier in x35, just use 102,9375 to boot then raise in special AFD to 102,97XX and put x37 multiplier... Rest of the settings are great... You should get 697 with 102,9375 and x37 multiplier...
  13. Having same problem since some days, moved to apprentice after a recalculation and never went back to Extreme
  14. Nice, destroying x299 Just kidding, bugged as f*ck, please remove score
  15. Fix the hardware description, it isn't 6700k and it isn't X99 SOC Champion
  16. Very nice review and very nice mems, great job... About mems, I didn't had any problems about running "non AMD Optimized B-Die" at 3200 C14 on Ryzen, so don't see the need of releasing new AMD compatible series when previous mems are 100% compatible.
×
×
  • Create New...