Alan_Alberino

No, will try later, thanks

3600 C16 B-Die, a good kit that runs above 4133 12-11 50/51 on AIO CPU (No cold IMC), tried all I mentioned above and also tried 3 different CPUs with good IMCs (All run 4133 12-11), but can't go higher than 4360MHz. Like I said, I reached that frequency even at C16, but cant go higher at any timings. Using 1.25 VCCIO, 1.35 VCCSA, both PLL voltages at 1.25v, and like I said before, vDimm from 1.6v to 1.9v didn't change anything.

Any tips for max memory clock? I can't get above 3370, I get that clock with any VCCSA and VCCIO in 1.2v and 1.35v range, any vDimm between 1.6 and 1.9v, and even timings from C16 to C31, tried different mem multipliers and also couldn't go higher. Most 2nd timings and all 3rd timings are auto, maybe that's the problem?

Great job, nice to see you found the efficiency you needed

In Asrock, I set 3866 c12-12-12-28 240 with rest on auto, then tight secondary and tertiary timings at 3866 and then push to +4000 and make the final profile. I tested 3 different CPUs and all made 4133 12-11, good board is more important than good IMC

Wow, you're on fire Nice to see new people in the high levels, keep pushing!

Yeah I know, but if the user doesn't provide the link or dont save the file, the submission will be invalid right?

Yeah, I was 1st at Division III, now I'm 11th with no posibility to submit scores at Time Spy stage since my GPU is a 560Ti that doesn't support DX12 I have a curious question. In case of benching without internet, that scores can't be validated online (Like my scores), even if the user dont use LOD, how is the procedure? I ask this since the score needs to be validated online and screenshot says that score can't be validated.

I cant rebench it, GPUs weren't mine, already returned them... I had LOD enabled since in theory it can be used in all GPU benchs for HWBOT submissions and I always have it on at my benching OS... Also, there are lot of scores without validation links out there, so check them when you can please, apply law for all and not only for some

"XTU GOD" WTF, 697 is very easy on MOCF

More people joining "the +100k club", congrats

But it also won't be a engineering sample since it's a final version of the product and principally it won't be a sample since users are buying them. HOF LN2 980Tis were available only at Galax store in a very limited quantity, that makes it an ES since you couldnt buy it at a store, only from the manufacturer and only at limited time (time that the stock of the only few units lasted)?

Actually if this would became a reality, you could buy it and it would stop being a ES since any user could buy it if they wanted it and had the money

So, now the task is convince Gigabyte to release a Z270-SOC Force LN2, right? I saw Z170X LN2 at CES and its a absolute beast, anyway retail boards like MOCF are very similar in mem OC Terms but it would be great to have another 2-dimm OC retail board from another brand

Titan X Pascal not allowed at competition........................

It sounds great, but the reality is that even banning ES, there are people that bins LOTS of retail CPUs and anyway they will be in better conditions than a average user, so they would still be a big disadvantage. About XTU, we had a discussion about that some months ago here in the forums about locked CPUs XTU and you defended it to death, and now you want to take them out cause they give lot of globals, so what's your idea? Leave them or kill them? I think XTU points should be limited for unlocked multiplier CPUs, on locked Skylakes CPUs is just average B-Die, a Asrock OCF/MOCF and go, I have 35 hardware points for a i3-6100 XTU submission that I replicated lot of times, nothing hard to get... I think that 35 hardware points for a score without even tweaking is ridiculous. 2D WR Points should also die, they are just brute force points on servers that a very very limited amount of people has access to, they don't have to much relate to overclocking that it's what HWBOT is about... About +1000 USD hardware, I said in other thread to have a +750 USD global category, and -750 USD global category, +750 USD category would have a little amount of users so it won't give that much points, and -750 USD would give same points than Titan XP now.

So, 743 was also posible on Asrock Great job, congrats!

Yeah, also FSU and Catzilla 4K since DX12 (time spy) and 4k (the two benchmarks I mentioned) are new GPU focuses, and they are designed for that, so we should test them with that...

Wow, massive point lose coming soon, and massive change coming in Z170X-SOC Force LN2 interested people thread ^^ Great work Matt, congrats for reaching "the imposible"!

Rise up those mems, if you can get 3866mhz or more with thight timings it would be great

Great, thanks

There are scores with normal GTX Titan X (Maxwell version), is that allowed? Since GTX 980 and 980Ti aren't allowed, GTX Titan X Maxwell shouldn't be allowed

Highbugged123

Correct Score is 1200.1, you have to post what CPU-Z shows

Z270 is too near now, make a z270-soc force LN2 close to launch date (and not a year later) and make everyone happy