K404

As title. I've just had a Kepler card maxx out at 999MHz, but I could only tell by checking Thermspy & nVidiaInspector.... as well as noticing that my scores weren't scaling. Most (all?) >1GHz scores I see are verified in the screenshot with GPU-Z only and they're listing 1100,1200MHz etc.... but the card (very probably) isn't running at those speeds

If we're selling something that benches at "X" MHz, i'd like to see proof including settings.... else there will be 400x 7GHz Ivys, but no screenshots

Interested in hearing about your DDR2 binning notes Congrats on being so close to having a "clean sweep"..... keep pushing it!!

Fair enough The difference is..... the other dual-die cards have their own official nVidia (or AMD) name and/or different specs to any single-die card. I don't mind either way

http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc-mac/pc-components/graphics-cards/evga-geforce-gtx-460-2win-990737/review If someone benched one of these, would it need its own category, or would it be ranked as an SLI of GTX460 256-bit?

100K GPU..... BIG milestone to break! Congrats Ronaldo

My clamp worked Last nights benching was FUN

Thanks for the guide! There was me thinking...."DCU II HD7970 LN2 guide...... Step 1: Buy a Lightning" Great scores!

Very nice sir, very nice Congrats!

The "SoF just beat my score" face

Thanks for the update and deadline, much appreciated (although.... i've been submitting as I bench, just in case) ..........big thanks to Genie too, for doing this :)

"3D06: See PC05." Did you mean "See 3D05?" Other than being CPU bound with a good card, I don't see a problem with it. Something else to mention that I think is important: every year, GPUs get us ~~40% higher scores (between architecture and MHz) (assuming no CPU bottleneck... maybe I should use GFlop increase as a marker) CPUs increase by.....10-15%. 3D Benchmark coders are NOT coding long-term benchmarks- the difference in progress between CPU and GPU is "too damned high"

Still struggling to see how he alone can suddenly have so many chips that are so much better than everyone elses and to get the MHz in one boot.... it's hard to argue with video evidence. Hacked CPU-Z itself? SetFSB? or somehow..... legit.

This goes against the idea of keeping things simple and easy to explain for newcomers. I'm happy with the number of benchmarks, I don't mind if there's more. There is a practical limit though, yes. People will vote to remove the benchmark that their main rival is benefiting most from. Instead of adding/removing benches, what about increasing or decreasing the hardware and global point weighting? (more emphasis on newer 3D benches...or good new 2D benchmarks that come along.) We really need a better wPrime (ie.....fixed length of time to "future-proof" it) A lot of people won't like this, but i'm gonna say it..... 3DMark01: at global level, a bencher watches "999" for 6 tests and Chase High..... then hopes for the best at the end when the score comes up. It's not interesting to watch, it's 12 years old, newcomers won't understand why there's so much emphasis on such an old bench......that only runs well on an OS that was replaced 5 years ago. It's hard to bench in front of an audience because there's nothing to watch and there's every chance they'll look at the LOD and think "cheat." It's CPU-dependent and ORB verification has been dropped. A .jpg image is all that sets the noobs apart from the pros. IMO.... and I know a LOT of people will disagree..... at practical level, it is time for this benchmark to very slowly start moving out of the light.

Thanks for the update

One of my dewars has lost its vacuum

LOL yea.....20-30 minutes. ML2 0GA

Have a think I'm not going anywhere.....

LOL now he has 2 chips at 8.4GHz or more Maybe I shouldn't comment on the Clarkdale score, I don't know enough about it

You should buy lottery tickets! Does your Evo have a voltage jumper?

The more you buy, the more you save. If you're Glasgow-ish, come over here sometime. I'm in Wishaw. My new contract appears to be "pay for what you take" so if you add your 25L dewar to my lineup, it'll be ~£15 (wait until I start getting my new bills and i'll confirm that) and if you like, chip in for delivery charge (which is £42)

wytiwx Celeron 347: 8398MHz! (FSB: 365!!!) Celeron 356: 8312MHz Celeron 352: 8228MHz Celeron 360: 8169MHz Celeron 365: 8065MHz All submitted in the space of a few weeks, from random batches no-one else has success with. I no longer believe in his scores. There were......25? people in the netburst 8GHz club, then this guy comes along with all these scores? i3 540: 280.7 BCLK?? The bigger problem: this guy might have found a way to hack CPU-Z validation.

I got my "best" score with disabled A.I. and LOD. I'm doing this all wrong, aren't I? My 3D06 has ALWAYS been bad with ATI. Some people quietly suggest using an older build of 3D06, with system info changed as necessary. Maybe that's part of my problem

I'm with Cryoservice. I've been getting bumped for two years, so this is their apology

What verification url?