Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Massman

Members
  • Posts

    20467
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Massman

  1. Updated opening post; no new leaders.
  2. Updated opening post, no new top scores.
  3. Updated opening post. New leaders! Focus: Richland APU 890.870 - daniz185 - A10-6800K @ 4991.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 Focus: Trinity APU 860.156 - Calathea - Athlon X4 750K @ 5000.00 MHz - 1333 MHz 9-12-12-24 2T - F2A85X-UP4 Overall Piledriver 860.156 - Calathea - Athlon X4 750K @ 5000.00 MHz - 1333 MHz 9-12-12-24 2T - F2A85X-UP4 Congrats all!
  4. Updated 5G thread. New leaders: Focus: Core i5 4690K 392.060 - minos - Core i5 4690K @ 4799.90 MHz - 1199.8 MHz 8-12-8-28-1T - Asus Maximus VII Hero Focus: Pentium G3258 Anniversary Edition 361.859 - dumo - Pentium G3258 @ 5001.30 MHz - 1333.8 MHz CL8-11-11-17 1T - \N \N Congrats!
  5. Up on NewEgg, but already out of stock.
  6. Yeah, good point. Combining multiple elimination points with an earlier release of the competition details like contest background should work. Especially since people need to prepare for competitions (acquire hardware, get some competition results, etc). That will require some long-term planning though .
  7. I see from the XTU hardware information that you are running single channel memory (1x 8GB). Is that correct? Single channel memory could severely reduce the XTU performance. Can you test with an additional stick of memory?
  8. Hah, not sure if anyone will find a better one. Yours is pretty darn crazy!
  9. Taipei, mid-october. Unofficially
  10. Yup, if you're going for PI-32M with memory under cold Asrock is a solid choice!
  11. I agree in theory, but our database does not support multiple devices to be tied to one submission. For example, we don't support a 3DMark submission with R9 290X + R9 290. In the case you have different hardware, the guideline states you must submit in the category of the better hardware. So in the example, the user would have to submit in the 2x R9 290X category.
  12. Good point. I've asked the development team to add an advanced option to load the hardware of a specific submission using the submission ID which you can find in the URL of a submission. That should be more user-friendly than making a list longer and longer
  13. Looks like someone already fixed it. The team URL is now: http://hwbot.org/team/overclockers.ua/, by the way
  14. Hahaha
  15. The hardware support range has since been extended to also support Sandy Bridge processors. But nothing prior to that and no other chipsets than Intel's.
  16. Good point. I'll update this week, but I assume we'll extend to the end of September (so one month extra - yeey!)
  17. The personal best scores should not show up in the hardware page, but that's by design rather than a bug. I don't understand why WPrime 1024M doesn't show up though. Let me get a bug tracker for that. Sorry for the inconvenience!
  18. Ah, good point. I'll add this to the competition page!
  19. Good point ZFess; added this as high priority to the backlog.
  20. Yeah. And then we complain there's no audience
  21. Hm, Can you give me the links to the scores ?
×
×
  • Create New...