Massman

Added a bit of formatting to the post, hope you don't mind Alex! For those who want a TL;DR of topics covered: Issue #1: I can’t go over DDR4-3600 on Maximus 4-dimm boards Issue #2: I am stuck at 55 41 78 or 3E POST CODE Issue #3: General behavior of various IC Issue #4: 2 DIMM vs 4 DIMM Issue #5: BAD RTL Training Issue #6: The TWRWR_DR and TWRWR_DR timings . Issue #7: TWRRD_DR and TWRRD_DD Issue #8: TWRRD_SG and TWRRD_DG Issue #9: TRDRD_dr and TRDRD_dd Issue #10: Proper Secondary Timings Issue #11: The sweetspot….So where do we have the best performance?

(also testing the new discussion features at OC-ESPORTS ... hehehehehe

http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/country_cup_2015/submissions - filter for the XTU stage and results from India. It's possible either Toolius or KSA has already uploaded a result to the 6xCPU category that is better than the score you have. Alternatively, have you uploaded a score with a different CPU that is higher than the one with the Core i7 5820K ?

Good to see 6820HKs popping up. Have you tried overclocking?

Done!

Gorod!! 6600GT master

First of all: thanks for the info Alex! I look forward to seeing to follow up with focus on Pi and XTU efficiency.

Thanks. We reached out to AMD tons of times already. Even if they don't want to spend a single dime, they could still use the free of charge API to host their OverDrive benchmark results.

WOW! Highest frequency ever for K6 processor?

Very odd. Definitely an error. Looking into it ...

Yup, will do. I'm also changing the OP to Christian Ney so he can use it for moderating

The t-shirts are for the people who win the lucky draw; not for everyone.

- temperature under load - all benchmarks have score divided by cores Fixed, good catch.

Nice!

The targets in the extreme category should be attainable without extreme cooling, I think.

Strong!

The reason why it says 1013.8 is because that stage requires 5 scores, so the only score is divided by 5. If you click on an average with more than one score attached to it, you will see the list of scores. Also, the scores show as a list in the participation field on the overview page, so it should be fairly easy to identify which scores are part of the country average for each score. The old site also didn't give much information on which scores were blocking others - that has always been a matter of communication between the participants. As for your question why the relevant hardware information isn't shown: that's related to the way tables are generated on both HWBOT and OC-ESPORTS. In short, most tables display the hardware information "relevant" to the benchmark. So for a CPU benchmark it will show the CPU; for a memory benchmark it will show the MEM. Depending on the back-end structure, it may be possible to extend the table with the information relevant to the stage. Bear in mind though that the Country Cup is designed to require communication between the overclockers participating in the country.

It's a bit of work, yes. Also, we prefer to improve the new interface than always going back to the old one.

Looking good Frederik! @skkmercer: I don't think even the old site would show the type of memory for Geekbench explicitly in a list. This overview will give you the list of scores that are being taken into account, but you will still have to check the score to see which memory was used. For the second part of your request: would a simple "all scores from Australia in this stage"-table suffice?

They are not valid since they don't have the official background.

Hi Overnight, Which version are you using specifically? Any version after v5.1.2 should work for HWBOT submission.

With a brief delay, here is the official wallpaper:

@Christian

It's true there is a significant lack of appreciation for the effort that goes in to top OC results, let alone the knowledge required to get there. but "I could do it to if I had that hardware" right?

How do you guys like the x265 benchmark for competitions ? Any major issues or all good ?