Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Noxinite

Members
  • Posts

    1515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Noxinite

  1. Bump. To clarify, there are 2x 2GB and 6x 1GB sticks available.
  2. Bump. G-die rejects added.
  3. I thought I had up to 695MHz screens, but I guess they got corrupted.
  4. Afaik it's been accepted that there is a 5% diff between valid and screenshots for the last few comps. Like in Team Cup with memory frequency. Ref freq should be no different compared to that.
  5. Not yet. I recently reflashed the bios of the Impact and it seemed to help with training ram, so maybe it was just a board issue.
  6. Surely the HW categories will determine all these issues?
  7. Yeah, I manually set that in OS. Didn't test how big a difference it made though. I guess I'll return at some point to figure out my crap efficiency...
  8. But the Crosshair IV isn't UEFI (has no mouse control in bios?)? Or am I missing something.
  9. I actually have that board, it was efficient for me too IIRC. But I managed to get plasticene in one of the ram slots, so now it doesn't clock ram very well.
  10. Temps? Most E0 chips walled at around 680MHz on phase (-45C) for me.
  11. Ah, hah! Found my initial single channel testing on phase. Not sure why I haven't managed to get similar clocks more recently on better sticks... Maybe my boot voltage binning method is awful? Haha.
  12. Bump.
  13. Is it required to only bench AM3 on Giga boards then? I tried some LN2 for TC, but only on 939 32M. It didn't go well, so I gave up.
  14. Nice Bull. I never figured out why my score was so slow. When I rebenched for TC I tightened RAS and RP and knocked off 6-8s, but still not good.
  15. Thanks for organising the comp Leeghoofd! Was a lot of fun, even if I didn't manage to successfully volt mod anything for it. XD Shoutout to r/OC for coming 2nd and beating us in DDR3 and DDR4!
  16. Awesome work! Congrats on no. 1. George you better get a move on.
  17. V3.3.# is not allowed - because it's so much faster.
  18. Maybe I mis-remembered. :/
  19. Tried some G-die on phase quickly, but kept getting 'not exact in round' even when trying 2948C9, which I could almost do on air. This run was looking to be around 18.5s: It seems like RCD is very important for this IC as well - compare the above screen to the below:Tried some C8, but again was getting 'not exact in round' a lot - it was also looking similar to 2949C9 all tight for efficiency: I also tried to get my OCF working again, but the USB headers as well as the back IO seem to be broken - and it doesn't like the USB 2.0 PCIE card I was using with Z170. It also instantly failed 2948C9 when I loaded it up. Edit: also seems like the issues I was having with cold PSC (code 15) at >2800MHz is the Impact struggling with IOLs/RTLs. Sometimes I need to manually set it and sometimes it needs the 1st channel IOL to be raised to 5.
×
×
  • Create New...