websmile

All Broadwell-E cpus were released long after the competition started. It is not allowed, this is a general guideline that we usually use. And it is not listed at allowed hardware for the comp, for all new NV GTX10x0 and also for new amd 480 we have same guideline, only stuff released before 1st of may 2016

Fixed

Yes, XTU frequency is what makes the limit

I already blocked it, please resubmit it at correct category (Firestrike) for which it is a valid result

I state it again, please new subs only in my opinion - I asked for clarification of head of moderation again, but it should make sense to anyone that 2015 results are not what we need at a competiton started 2016

Keep the results, safe, due to current computex stress it might take a few days, but be sure you can load them long before official end az 30th of june

Good session

fixed

This looks a lot like 980ti - please fix or let me know, at wr stage chaos this happens easily - strong score btw

No need, points only spoil the character

Final check done, neat work done by all participants. Grats to Techsweden and all contestants, good work

The competition ends like all rounds on 30th of june, lets blame techsweden for this - I created a task, this should both get fixed in next days, but please understand that guys currently have big work at computex, so don´t lose patience if it takes a bit longer

Awesome round, lots of interesting results, even a clarkfail entered - final check done, all valid for me, grats to the winner HWbotHellas O/C Team and to all for doing a very good job

Great card on air

Impressive, but 01 eff for windows 98 is not too good it seems^^ - good job

Good result, rip board

awesome run and awesome sandbagging

Look who is benching there...

Not bad

Awesome work last days, XA, flood of top scores

Awesome cpu, mine was much older(L524), as usually batches say nothing

we want to keep a solid pattern for all rounds, so I fear we have to live with this now. Sorry, this was for sure not ideal, but we normally guarantee cpu group stays the same, we can add when new ones are launched, which might happen, but people also bought for round 1 and relied on this to be OK. Our bad for sure, sorry again, but I think this is best way we could handle and repair mistake

It is highly annoying and it is clear that it is our datbase and our mistake then, no doubt. But as said, if you check Round 1, you see that 5,6 and 7 plus kabini were allowed and database took the the results and added to the competition at listing we had. I can not say what exactly went wrong, we wanted exact same hardware restrictions we had at round 1 but it obviously turned out differently, no idea why. I was not in charge of planning of round 1, when I saw that 5,6 and 7 were submitted like it is logical for the "second tier" AMD division, I did planning for hwrestrictions to be exactly the same. It is not logical to rule out 78xx for example, if you see stuff like this in the future, ask immediately to avoid annoyance like now

No, we did not change the rules in the middle of the competition, we corrected a problem. The rules for hardware allowed are same as on round 1, but due to database obviously this did work different, AMD 7870K was intended to be allowed like on round 1 of this division where you could submit with it if you check. We only corrected this to be same cpu pattern after people made us notice this

Batch? Exact same values like my old 6600K