Don_Dan

Good work, Frank!

All cleaned up. Let me know if I missed one.

One run takes 51 minutes, much better than the 59 minutes of GPUPI 1B.

Nice work, almost got me! :D

Can you please add the ASUS GL703GM (Notebook) Motherboard.

It has always been like this for Country Cup and Team Cup, Boris. No, it is Monday 10th, 23:37 CET.

Nice one, George!

Welcome back, Boris! :)

That's a pretty nice chip!

Well done, Nico and Kai! :)

No, buy them!

Yeah, let's hear what the other have to say. Maybe my feeling is off. Also thanks for the info regarding the other rankings.

I thought @Leeghoofd had asked richba5tard to add 1151 v2, but in the database there's only LGA1151 right now, which is including all Core i7 6xxx, 7xxx, 8xxxx and 9xxxx.

It's looking quite good, but I don't really like the impact of the competition points on the ranking. I think the algorithm should be changed to Top 30 submission points, to increase the importance of the normal scores and also broaden the amount of scores needed. By the way, which ranking (Career Ranking or xxxx Season) is used for: xxxx Leage? National? Team? Global Masters? All global points? Regarding the Achievements, if they're too much load on the server, I guess no one would really miss them. At least I would be fine with scrapping them, if it makes HWBOT more responsive and more future-proof. Regarding what James said about benchmarks with global points, I'd say we should discuss it in a separate topic, but in general I agree with his statement and he already named some of the benchmarks that we should look at.

I agree, after all a great score worth many points is still a great score after many years. This is especially true for the hardware points, where many records are many years old. In my opinion and as Albrecht has edited above, removal of the Hardware master league would cause a major outrage among the users. Is it that difficult to maintain and causing so much server load that it's better to cut it off?

It isn't good to hear that there's a need to change the point algorithm again, but I understand where you're coming from, Frederik. I need to think about some things before I post them, but here are some thoughts: - Keep the competition points, as Albrecht said they're a nice motivator for people to participate in the competition. - Do I understand correctly, that for the new league position, you want to sum up all the points made in the respective year? I would propose the same approach for user, team and country ranking. Calculate Top 20 Global Points (/WR Points) + Top 20 Hardware points + Top 10 Competition Points. For the user ranking just the user in their respective league, for the team ranking the highest scores of all team members and for the country ranking the highest scores of all the countrymen. - Should we discuss getting rid of some of the benchmarks? PCMarks come to mind, or some of the many variants of the 3D benchmarks (lower end 3DMark and Catzilla). - Would it save coding work to get rid of oc-esports.io and host the competitions on HWBOT again? I mean, we use the normal HWBOT design etc. instead of the oc-esports.io one. - Can we get the global points back for 3DMark 06?

Hey Sam, I'll take the Mushkin Level I and Level II.

Well done, Charles! :)

Steve, how are you doing? :)

I'm with Allen, we should be very careful before making any adjustments to avoid making the point algorithm even more complicated than it already is.

Thank you, David! Good to see you around!

My package arrived with the parts in good condition. Thanks for the deal!

My package arrived with the parts in good condition. Thanks for the deal!

Great job!

What he said. Please add pictures of the goods with your nickname in the picture to the OP.