rbuass Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 No. ... I am saying is that in my opinion, it should be extreme overclocking and have good results, otherwise there is no reason to separate the UFL of XOL. If the same thing, no need for three leagues and only two would suffice (XOL and no XOL). I think that if they create two different leagues for people using extreme cooling systems, they should be divided according to some criterion, and not by choice that otherwise would have no meaning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 20, 2011 Author Share Posted March 20, 2011 We could 'limit' it using very lax limitations. Something like 'must have been in top-100' or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbuass Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 (edited) Hmhmh... One idea is: Top 20 or top 30 (+ or) good hwbot achievments like OC Knight or more... Will separate and encourage the guys to bench more and more following best results... I would like to keep the achievements...but don t know if it will continue.. Is only my opinion... What hwbot decide will be ok for me,,, Edited March 20, 2011 by rbuass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbuass Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 Our ETA for a very first release is 1st of March, for all features in rev4 1st of April. Hi friends...any news about Rev.4??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|ron Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 Hi rbuass, as Pieter was saying in another topic, Richbastard had to re-write some parts of Rev4 code, so it's under development Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 Hi rbuass, as Pieter was saying in another topic, Richbastard had to re-write massman's parts of Rev4 code, so it's under development  Corrected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|ron Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 Rofl, I see Pieter is paying hard the April Fool's joke he did :D :asd: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GF]Duke Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 I havn't seen anything on the Rev. 4 lately. How is everything going? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 23, 2011 Author Share Posted April 23, 2011 Â All Rev 3.9.X are small steps that lead up to Rev4. The final R3 version you currently use is 3.8.0. None of the 3.9.X will be public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GF]Duke Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Thanks for the update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiller Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 i hate the ,update, 2years ago it was good, much better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiller Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 with a Server 4x 7500 xeon super wprime time gets less points then a  single core doing Wprime,  i find that not realistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 Having expensive server should yield more points than pushing cheap single core Sempron? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiller Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 no, the fastest score ,no matter witch hardware is used should get better points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 So, like I said, having the expensive hardware is better than pushing cheap stuff? It's better because it gets more points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiller Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 it's more normal that a faster score gets better points, no matter what hardware is used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Then only 4-way GPU and giga-servers get boints. How interesting is that? Not so much. Â The ranking isn't perfect (most of the gold cups with 10+ more submissions that get 2 boints pr run are alot more difficult to beat than the 50th place 20 boint scores in the popular categories is another example), but we can only try to improve it. Â Perhaps if 300 people benched those servers it would be different... Then you'd get alot of boints for those results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 it's more normal that a faster score gets better points, no matter what hardware is used. Â Why is that 'more' normal? Â If I beat 1 million other Sempron 145 overclockers, is that worth less than someone beating 1 other 980X overclocker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Chiller, current score algorythm awards points mostly based on "how much people you beat" rather than "how good your score is" hence multi-CPU systems score low since not much people have them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 Sam, please help to define the characteristics of "good score" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Sam, please help to define the characteristics of "good score" I think we've already discussed that it's a difficult thing to measure hence we use the current scoring system, no ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I think that a "good score" (by Chiller) is when you are more close to a TEWROAMTOXB... (The Extremest World Record Of All Time Of X Benchmark), so for that you need the fastest and expensive hardware never seen. Â But, I love Rev 3, It was a good step from Rev 2. Â So have we will Rev 4 in one week?? :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Holy grail would be an algorithm that could roughly calculate score efficiency Rivatuner graphs could show the GPU MHz, so downclocking for the screenshot wouldn't work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voidn Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Â All Rev 3.9.X are small steps that lead up to Rev4. The final R3 version you currently use is 3.8.0. None of the 3.9.X will be public. Â So is this still a go? Rev 4 in two days? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.