Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank you, Terra Raptor!

Looks like XTU is not valid anymore.

 

Let me know your opinion, please vote:

 

1. Just 2 current benchmarks;

2. Add one more and share what do you want?

Posted

Let others decide. I won't use it for qualifiers but the tweak is simple enough to be discovered by others. And it allows runs with deviations small enough (I.e. +10 points to an average 1320) to be accepted by most moderators.

Me personally vote for 2 benchmarks (pifast and fsx) with equal point distribution (50%/50%).

Posted

Benchmark compromised - I pass validation and, again, the thing I do is not against the rules. I will try to qualify. You see better options than deny xtu from qualification? What if I share tweak with other guys but not with you?)

Posted
Benchmark compromised - I pass validation and, again, the thing I do is not against the rules. I will try to qualify. You see better options than deny xtu from qualification? What if I share tweak with other guys but not with you?)

 

No matter what will be done...but said anyway!

You're right, slams is right, everyone is right...but as I said...sad anyway

Posted (edited)
Benchmark compromised - I pass validation and, again, the thing I do is not against the rules. I will try to qualify. You see better options than deny xtu from qualification? What if I share tweak with other guys but not with you?)

 

Does this issue only happen in Windows 8.1 / Windows 8?

 

If yes the solution would be simple to ban the OS (again).

 

We can always switch to another benchmark and also extend the qualification timeframe if required. That would not be an issue.

 

Also switching from XTU 5 GHz to XTU full-out might be a solution. Depending on what exactly caused the bug we're talking about.

Edited by der8auer
Posted

XTU reports a frequency of 5,7 GHz. I think if we set the limit there to 5,1 it could solve the issue. I think there is a problem with reading out the frequency wrong and XTU does some "score calculation" (which we know doesn't exist :D )

 

Maybe you can recheck that?

Posted (edited)

i'm for replace xtu with spi 32m @ 5ghz, in the finals there's always spi 32m and if the purpose of xtu @ 5ghz was see who is the more skilled with the same frequency, well the spi 32 can be perfect.

 

I don't waste my time trying to compete with some bugged result.

 

But this is only my opinion

Edited by RULE
Posted

Adding another benchmark now...i think that's not a good solution for those that already did their scores!

Deleting xtu ok...but adding another benchmark...limited again at 5ghz...we all know which psc kit will win!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...