Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

HWBOT Community Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

extreme TIM roundup

Featured Replies

I made thermal paste roundup using liquid nitrogen.

Results are pretty interesting :)

 

 

 

Link to my test

 

It is in Polish, but you can put it to Google Translate. I checked translation to English. It is rather imperfect, but you will know what is it all about ;)

 

10w6ky6.jpg

Edited by ivanov

Hm, dat strange. Completely different to what I saw in der8auer's roundup - gelid GC-E was performing better in his tests.

  • Author

Yeah, I know. I was also surprised.

Before the test began I was 100% sure, that GC-Extreme would win with ease.

 

Keep in mind that some of the samples were directly from vendors and some were just from regular shops. I know it is serious accusation, but maybe sometimes what we get in shop isn't exactly the same, what we get directly from vendor (there were several PSU issues like this, that I read about) :P But it is just my theory, I have no proof to back it up.

Edited by ivanov

Wow yes, did not see this coming at all. Noctua on top?? Gelid extreme close to bottom in every temp... I think I've got a tube of the noctua paste at home, will give it a try on compressor.

  • Author

And one more thing. I know it sounds not modest, but I think Roman didn't conduct his test 100% properly (sorry Roman).

 

As it is said in the arcticle, his first mistake is, that he didn't go to -190 degrees C. Stopping at -150 makes the test not good, since at -150 some pastes just start to loose their thermal conductivity.

In my opinion second mistake is this thermal probe attached to the top of CPU IHS.

  • Author

I also speaked with Xtreme Addict bout EVGA Frostbite. This paste shoud perform better in my opinion.

He said that it needs very high pressure to work well. I didn't test it, since I wanted to give each paste equal chance. So every single TIM was given exactly the same pressure (you can see in the pictures, that pot springs were compressed, but not extremely tight).

Ivanov, I've read the complete test but some of the translation is... funny (Ryba means fish lol? that made for some confusing sentences at start)

 

Can you explain here how did you measure cpu temp?

  • Author

Yes, ryba means fish in Polish ;)

 

There is no CPU in my test. I used dummy load (set of resistors), that is usually used to check perfomace of phase change cooling.

 

 

 

By the way, it seems, that AAB TG3 is rebrand of Phobya HeGrease Extreme (all parametrs are the same), although it is not official info.

Edited by ivanov

It can also be the case that a manufacturer varies components of the paste down the production line to minimise the costs while remaining in a given spec.

  • Author

I also thought of that.

 

For example it could be like this, that what you can buy now in shop, as Gelid GC-Extreme is not exactly the same, as it used to be at the GC-Extreme introduction to the market.

 

But keep in mind - it is only my assumption.

Great roundup !!

The only thing I can see here that also could change results is in my testing I had a number if paste that could keep a very tight delta, the differances where what paste would hold together under massive load spikes. Gelid for me was the strongest at holding the load and not cracking losing all thermal transfer. Noctua paste was one I had tested that did not hold up well at all when tested with 3d06 CPU test at 6GHz.

  • Author

Thanks :)

 

Well, that is a good point. In near future I intend to check some of the pastes using i7-3770K with full pot, just to see which one offers best CPU-Z frequency and which performs well with e.g 3DM 06 CPU test.

 

 

I also plan to check more TIMs. As you see in the picture below I have much more, then are included in the roundup right now ;)

 

01lgkis.jpg

Edited by ivanov

I know extremeTIM, he's actually a good friend of mine.

 

 

 

PS keep a heads up for MSI's new line of BBQ, and BBQ accessories.

i only use noctua nt-h1 for CB chips(specially 4770k @ -100 to -130) but good to know it will be good on full pot too

nice work man

  • Crew
I know extremeTIM, he's actually a good friend of mine.

 

 

 

PS keep a heads up for MSI's new line of BBQ, and BBQ accessories.

 

I like this :D - I think I will most likely buy :P

1374655169a127.gif

 

 

 

@topic Valuable information, thanks for the test :)

Nice :)

 

How much was your dummy load ? 200w ?

It could be nice to see with 400-500w :)

 

Thank you for your works, it's not funny to test TIM, but it's reallllyyy interesting ;)

 

something I notice during my test : for CPU (Fx8155), with EVGA or with Gelid, it can reach the same freq ( 8.4G) BUT, on VGA, between EVGA and Gelid.... it's 100% different

Maybe T° ( full pot for CPU and -130 for VGA),

or

surface ( big between cpu/pot and smaller between vga/pot. smaller surface -> TIM is more important)

or

Watt

 

If you have time, it will be awesome to test gelid vs "hot gelid". 1st put gelid, test, then put gelid, heat @80°C or more and put pot and test.

 

 

Anyway thanks for sharing ;)

  • Author

It was exactly 261 W load.

 

I must admit it was quite fun for me to make this test :) The only downside was, that I had to "waste" LN2 which could be used for OCing ;)

 

I heated the pot to 50 oC (cured the paste) before pouring LN2.

noctua for me it's very special.....but for me cracks at -140....did you try compound cracks temp??? thanks

 

EDIT: i looked now the video, the two probe have 4° of difference in reading! the probe on lower of display is more warm about 4°!

 

and for tighten the mounting screws with the same force, you must to measure the height of the springs compressed(if all springs it's the same)!

Edited by barbonenet

  • Author

EDIT: i looked now the video, the two probe have 4° of difference in reading! the probe on lower of display is more warm about 4°!

Think about it.

There is thermal probe in TIM, layer of copper (heater), layer of TIM, layer of copper (LN2 container), thermal probe in TIM.

 

When you turn the heater on, it would be quite strange if both thermal probes shown the same temperatures. It is rather obvious, that probes will show different temperatures.

 

 

 

Springs are equally compressed, threads are of different length.

 

I turned off and on the heater under -190 oC to simulate stress.

Edited by ivanov

Think about it.

There is thermal probe in TIM, layer of copper (heater), layer of TIM, layer of copper (LN2 container), thermal probe in TIM.

 

When you turn the heater on, it would quite strange if both thermal probes shown the same temperatures. It is rather obvious, that probes will show different temperatures.

 

 

 

Springs are equally compressed, threads are of different length.

 

I turned off and on the heater under -190 oC to simulate stress.

thanks for reply...very good test;)

 

can i ask you what's the compression of springs? 1-2mm or 3-4mm?? thanks;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.