Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

User liqmet


Recommended Posts

No problem.

Always good to see you around. Don't be a stranger. :)

 

Same here old friend :celebration: , not a good way to come back to hwbot as you know i have retired from benching over 2 years ago. I have only come back to hwbot because of this troll liqmet , i cannot believe they are letting stuff like this happen at hwbot , seriously this need to stop and stop now , asap or it will snowball soon ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monday morning here.

 

Just got in the forum , to see (once again) , that user liqmet is still going strong.

 

This time , i had an other 9 year+ score reported

:ws:

 

Tasos this guy do not want to listen to anyone , he keeps doing it everyday , it is very annoying and disturbing. he is out of control with the false reporting and trolling , i am 100% sure he knows exactly what he is doing is wrong , very wrong , this abusive behavior needs to stop and cannot be tolerated any longer. I have already sent PM to @Richbastard @Massman @Christian Ney to let them know of this problematic user , they will take proper action , soon i hope.

 

Kind Regards: Angelo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

По руÑÑки - к Ñтарым результатам неприменимы Ñовременные правила (вплоть до 2009 Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð²Ñех теÑтов, Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð°ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð¼Ð°Ñ€ÐºÐ° до 2012). Правила менÑлиÑÑŒ, Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ‚ÐµÑ… времен результаты были оформлены доÑтаточно правильно, чтобы получать меÑто и очки. Ðовые правила не имеют обратной Ñилы, поÑтому нефиг жаловатьÑÑ Ð½Ð° результаты, датированные более ранним временем, чем Ñ‚Ð²Ð¾Ñ Ñ€ÐµÐ³Ð¸ÑÑ‚Ñ€Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ð° боте. Ферштейн?

 

Mkay

 

Since it is not possible to remove the possibility to report submissions for a single user (without touching the code).

I will "kindly" ask him to stop reporting via PM.

 

EDIT: Wait, someone here speaks Russian? :D

 

Already done that , by TerraRaptor

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Administrators

It means if a card can generate a result at correct settings it is ok. Some old cards cannot run all tests at some 3DMarks, the x800 for example has no sm3 and skips the SM3 test at 3DM06 - you get a valid result nontheless, low score, but it is ok. When you have a card that can run 01, but has not enough videoram to run nature, this test ist automatically skipped at a full run. You still get a result, but the score is low. No need to report these, we accept this result because it ran all possible tests the card could at rules settings and gives a score :). So please do not report these, they are ok :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

3DMark 01 was released start of 2001, dx9 was released december 2002 iirc - anyway, let´s simply stay with the fact that on some 3dmarks an overall result (score) given with missing subtest is still valid, you have no advantage from this because the score will always be lower than if you run all subtests that are offered. Hwbot always accepted these,tthe 3dmark06 was an example for this with the radeon x8xx series

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no,you not understand what i mean (i know about miss subtest and give low score)...you read what i write in the description for report?probably no

 

can not run 3dm01 any subtest including low car-get error out of videomem...memory on card 8 mb and everyone who has tried on this card run test get error...how do you explain that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

He might have modded driver or done something else, he has subtest results, resolution is OK and settings look ok as well. I cannot block a score because you cannot do what he can. I read your comment, but the screenshot is solid and was checked now by Ney first and by me afterwards

Edited by websmile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

because we are all here so stupid and they are geniuses)I expected such a response from you)

once you bother that people send reports - then remove everywhere this option of sending reports, let there be cheaters,bug users and photoshop/paint masters facepalm lol)

okey this is your choice,let so is be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

This had nothing to do with genius, if I have no proof of cheating I don´t block - and guys like you who behave like 6 year old and report same submission 10 times again and again should not be able to report, I agree, because you are not only arrogant but also do not respect rules and ruling :) the fact you obviously dont understand what discussion closed means earns you a timeout, maybe you learn then :)

Edited by websmile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

User liqmet ... again.

 

This time , reporting 10 year old results ... again.

 

Reporting ATI 9800 SE results , for not beeing 9800 SE.

The reason (for him) is because the are 256bit.

 

Somebody with much more brains than liqmet , created 2 seperated categories for ATI 9800 SE , in hwbot database.

 

1)ATI 9800 SE

2)ATI 9800 SE 128bit

 

Anybody have a wild guess why ???

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

 

1)ATI 9800 SE

2)ATI 9800 SE 128bit

 

Anybody have a wild guess why ???

:)

 

Those categories are old...

And I guess they were created because of the problem Ati/AMD has for years: They simply dont give a f***, how their cards gets identified. Thus those categories where created because GPU-Z said it.

Those old categories need a cleanup, need to find time for that. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those categories are old...

And I guess they were created because of the problem Ati/AMD has for years: They simply dont give a f***, how their cards gets identified. Thus those categories where created because GPU-Z said it.

Those old categories need a cleanup, need to find time for that. :)

 

Gregor

 

Those two 9800SE categories are correct.

9800SE's exist in both 256bit and 128bit versions.

 

The problem here is that "liqmet" thinks that only 128bit are 9800SE and is reporting all other results.

 

I agree with you on the general identification problem with ATI/AMD cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
Gregor

 

Those two 9800SE categories are correct.

9800SE's exist in both 256bit and 128bit versions.

 

The problem here is that "liqmet" thinks that only 128bit are 9800SE and is reporting all other results.

 

I agree with you on the general identification problem with ATI/AMD cards.

 

I just took a look at TPU GPU db and saw there is only a 128bit SE. But multiple sources on the internet and our entries claim there is also a 256bit version of the card. I changed the name scheme of those cards to make it easier to see the difference.

Ill also drop a message to TPU GPU DB maintainer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...