-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645970

 

has to be athlon 3400+, not sempron because of the superior result. Can't verify as there is no screen either...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618521

 

wrong pifast version

Edited September 15, 2008 by knopflerbruce

[71proste]

Pls fix "validated scores"

 

invalid and still points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626165

no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724621

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723327

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721727

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688736

256mb instead of 512mb

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713672

 

btw: please fix these results I've reported trought the site

Edited September 20, 2008 by 71proste

[maxine]

Please fix this "Admin validated" results, tnx:

 

Resolution not showed:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971

 

6800ultra in 6800(simple) categ:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024

[71proste]

Resolution not showed:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971

resolution must be visible from since 2008

Edited September 17, 2008 by 71proste

[maxine]

Resolution not shown, but also is a 6800GT in 6800(simple categ)....

[Freakezoit]

Why is my score blocked Futuremark link is there that shows the res. only on the verfication screen res. is not visible. But that is not necessary.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=773671

[71proste]

fixed!

 

maybe you can fix these as well,hmm????

invalid and still points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626165

no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724621

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723327

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721727

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688736

256mb instead of 512mb

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713672

8800gtx instead of 6600gt duo

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774277

no riva tuner,no gpu-z,reported already but not fixed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686044

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686019

Edited September 21, 2008 by 71proste

[71proste]

after15.05.08?hmm,my fault

I deleted all of them,but the rest of scores are ok,I mean to be deleted

have a nice Holidays mate

Edited September 20, 2008 by 71proste

[T_M]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=767725

 

'03 bugged run.

COmpare to my 156k result at higher CPU and GPU clocks.

[Sweet]

Please check and delete these bad scores, , Wprime ver. 1.63 ( same guy...)

 

 

Please remind him, using WPrime 1.55 This is mandatory

 

WPrime 1024:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771790

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771756

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771737

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771724

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771717

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771684

 

Wprime 32:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771743

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771733

 

I report these, but so far, nothing

 

Thank you and regards

 

Sw

 

Jmke my friend , please fix it, and this

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774126 PcMark'05 with RamDisc software...

 

and let you continue your holiday

 

Holidays , are good...

 

Sw

[Bustah]

Aquamark 03 and crossfirex. 3870 x2

 

Still there are many scores in aquamark run using xp. 2 cards may be installed but 4gpus cannot be enabled because xp doesn't support it, therefore a true run of aquamark can only be run in vista. [for 2x 3870 x2] which has 4 active cores not 2 which is only one card.

I reported some scores already but a mod has allowed them? how can they be valid if only one card is actually being used?

 

here is one example of what I mean. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=766225

 

check the screen in that link, the drop down box shows 2 cards installed but only 2gpus are enabled.

here is another one http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=769543 see the screen? only 2 gpus enabled.

 

for 2x3870 x2's to be used the screens will show 4gpus enabled like this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=744256 Look at the clocks needed here compared to the other scores I have mentioned.

 

This can only be done using Vista which makes any score with only 2gpu cores enabled =one card which in effect any 2x 3870x2 score done in xp is invalid, please can the mods here make a decision on this, I first mentioned this a couple of months back, if you are saying its ok to have two cards installed but only one active which will be the case in xp then I will run benches under those terms and can hit close to 300k@ under 5ghz on a dual core cpu, if not please deal with these invalid scores.

 

I have only posted 2 examples of invalid scores here but there are many, probaly about 30-40% of all scores submitted in this category have only 2 cores enabled, meaning only one card is enabled. [2 installed only one active in the case of xp]

 

I hope my explanation is clear, one of the mods recently turned off reporting on many of these scores giving the reason that crossfirex is not supported in xp and has allowed the scores, this is exactly my point for not allowing them!

 

The same applies for 3dmark 01 scores submitted in 2x3870 x2 category many submissions there with only 2gpus enabled =one active card.

thanks.

Edited September 22, 2008 by BUSTAMOVE

[Droperidolum]

Hi! Wrong 3DMark Vantage with PhysX also post here?

Here are some on 9800GTX:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758610

(and many more wrong results from this user here. On same config... Really assiduous gyu )

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768601

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=747380

[Matti OC]

hi, with PhysX !!!

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=747448

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=774812

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=759851

 

lg Matti OC

[PCGH_Carsten]

There's two results in the heavily contested Radeon 9200 SE 3DMark 2001 SE score, which seem to be off a little - especially because one cannot see the settings of the benchmarks.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547832

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572770

 

 

resolution must be visible from since 2008

So, that means, that anyone who might have cheated his points before that is quite untouchable now that the system's moved to more failproof verification?

 

If so, I do not like this at all.

Edited September 24, 2008 by PCGH_Carsten

[Bustah]

those scores are not validated please use the site's report a score tool. this thread is only for scores which are validated but still wrong... like thread title say thanks

 

Can you check my post on page 19 and make a decision please, if they stand [the scores I've highlighted] among others in the categories I mentioned I will submit scores I have run under the same conditions thanks.

[Freakezoit]

Physx Driver used but marked as Ok ???

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=765574

[PCGH_Carsten]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644077

 

It says in the verification screen plainly visible 6800 GT - not 6800 [blank]

 

edit:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971

this also...

 

edit2:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643862

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643873

Since this was the same user with the same setup and the same freqs, there's strong indication that this also was a 6800 GT.

Edited September 25, 2008 by PCGH_Carsten

[arslankurt]

should someone re-check my score

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655707

I fixed the problem(verification url) ı want my points

[Just Learnin']

should someone re-check my score

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655707

I fixed the problem(verification url) ı want my points

 

The verification link shows that you ran 3D06 at 1280x768 resolution, it has to be run at 1280x1024 to be valid.

[arslankurt]

but I use default settings.I'm not using the profetional version of the 3dmark06,so I can not change the resolution settings

[BootSector]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660326

This result is submitted to AGP card's page instead of PCI-E one.

[westsider]

somebody deleted my WR 1x3870

please explain why

 

i had ORB verification

[71proste]

but I use default settings.I'm not using the profetional version of the 3dmark06,so I can not change the resolution settings

 

what is the max resolution of your display??

Edited September 30, 2008 by 71proste

[Just Learnin']

but I use default settings.I'm not using the profetional version of the 3dmark06,so I can not change the resolution settings

 

You then have to plug it into a monitor capable of 1280X1024. Your current monitor/display is probably not capable of this so the benchmark runs at the best it can get from that monitor BUT that is not good enough for a valid score. Guessing you are on a laptop? Can you hook it up to a monitor capable of 1280X1024 and run the benchmark using that?

[arslankurt]

It was an old score,laptop was "sony VGN-A517B" X-black LCD 17.0" WXGA+ (1440 x 900)...I'll try ıt again,if I find that laptop again(next week I think)