Fasttrack - Core i7 6700K @ 5000MHz - 5min 9sec 284ms GPUPI for CPU - 1B

[Guest Sinebrychof]

Cpu frequency has been changed during run, cheat like the x265 4k...

[KaRtA]

I am with Luumi on this. OpenCL2.0 and W10. Total BS. Happy to be proven wrong.

 

Please, prove me wrong.

[Fasttrack]

Cpu frequency has been changed during run, cheat like the x265 4k...

 

Luumi, it seems that you do not like other "inferior" members to produce better scores.

So be it.

 

Cheat is a heavy word, if you can't prove what you are saying.

 

Simple example -

If I did what you are suggesting ( which I am not ), how come my Geekbench 3 - single core

score is 59.. something, in the 8, 9, 10 place...I do not recall exactly.

 

In Geekbench I did not raise frequency and did it in other benchmarks ?

 

To earn what ?

I am seventh overall and finished - done.

 

Prizes are for the first two.

 

So either 7 or 17 no difference.

 

Be a bit more careful with the word cheat.

[Bulshooter]

you are the first three loops slower than my score, than you are faster with open cl 2.0 and win 10, no way

[KaRtA]

Also George, if you x265 is that much faster than others, your XTU should blow them out.

[Fasttrack]

you are the first three loops slower than my score, than you are faster with open cl 2.0 and win 10, no way

 

Different batch and reduction.

Works better. Slower first four loops and accelerates onwards.

 

Any suggestions of cheating useless.

No money, no prizes no points, no Geekbench 3 cheat.

Invalid accusations for no reason.

[Fasttrack]

Also George, if you x265 is that much faster than others, your XTU should blow them out.

 

Severe problem with Aorus Gaming 5 bios.

XTU was run on a Gaming 5 and all the rest on a Gaming 7 to which I switched yesterday.

Check it out in the submissions details.

 

Meaningless to re-bench.

Even if I go as high as 1770++, cant reach the first four.

 

Game over.

 

And I hope that jumping to conclusions without asking first, is over.

[Rauf]

Naive of hwbot to use cheatable benchmarks in low clock competitions. You think this is the only result?

[Splave]

Naive of hwbot to use cheatable benchmarks in low clock competitions. You think this is the only result?

 

what this guy said /thread

[KaRtA]

George, stop playing with yourself. I think it's pretty evident what has happened here.

 

You were always the first in interject when some was 'cheating' in the past, but look at you now.

 

Sorry, but the smell of BS is strong even from here on the other side of the globe. Clean it up.

[GeorgeStorm]

Is there no way of knowing? I've always thought limited freq competitions are difficult as surely you could increase by a small amount and then decrease for screenshot so it just looks like an efficient run?

[Fasttrack]

George, stop playing with yourself. I think it's pretty evident what has happened here.

 

You were always the first in interject when some was 'cheating' in the past, but look at you now.

 

Sorry, but the smell of BS is strong even from here on the other side of the globe. Clean it up.

 

What Tobias ( Rauf ) said.

Complaints to HWBOT.

I question 20 other results myself.

 

BS smell ( what a kind way to put it ), is all over the competition.

 

Delete the whole competition.

Not sufficient frequency monitoring validation available.

 

Everyone can believe what he wants or suits him best.

[KaRtA]

Some people work hard for their results, which many I see at the top do.

Some.......well, look to take the easy way and think it's OK, no-one will know and ruin the experience for the others.

 

Why would they delete a competition aimed for everyone for the few bad-eggs that think the easy way is the way to go because they are too lazy, or don't have the skill.

 

You easily swayed to the negative/cut the whole thing off George.

[Leeghoofd]

George plz provide me the version of OpenCL you used so I can verify the speed difference versus the older 1.2 version, thank you