Jump to content

Featured Replies

15 minutes ago, GRIFF said:

eliminate 100% of all types of cheats

I've got a thermometer that always shows 28 degrees :P

  • Replies 76
  • Views 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • I'm sorry, but the choice is made. And my mistake but we leave it in the respect of those who are already preparing for the competition.

  • GeorgeStorm
    GeorgeStorm

    Apologies if things are incorrect, mixture of lack of knowledge of the platforms and setting the limitations within the HWBOT competition engine! I'll try to get it sorted tonight.

  • Why are Intel chipset's not allowed though? Is there some specific reason for it? 

Posted Images

  • Author
24 minutes ago, ZFeSS said:

I've got a thermometer that always shows 28 degrees :P

???

Let's see if i can be bothered, got boards and coupple dozen chips but no real motivation for air clocking, was hoping for unlimited cooling (got 60l on standby) :D

Griff, do you think we can eliminate the video unless there is a discrepancy? I mean, your hardware limitations by themselves will limit your competition to only a handful of overclockers to start with, and we all know who each other is already. Do you really expect any foul play enough to warrant a vid right upfront?

Edited by Mr.Scott

Even if i had or could obtain the necessary hardware at reasonable cost, I think the added hassle of futzing around with recording a video of every potential result would rule me out. A one off video to verify a result is one thing but making a video every run is just too much to ask.

These cpus are quite easy - the edge of stability for these is quite easy to find so once you will find it you can make video. It is very unlikely you can get result beyond that edge to have multiple attempts to record video.

@GRIFF, suggestion. Would it be possible to change 9100 to 9550 or 9200/9250 (which are almost 10 times more popular)? We have only 125 subs with 9100 @hwbot, which indicates 9100 is relatevely rare card. Anyway, most likely I won't be benching 3d even if 9550 is allowed but that may become an entry ticket for many other ocers.

Edited by TerraRaptor

On 4/12/2019 at 7:59 AM, TerraRaptor said:

These cpus are quite easy - the edge of stability for these is quite easy to find so once you will find it you can make video. It is very unlikely you can get result beyond that edge to have multiple attempts to record video.

@GRIFF, suggestion. Would it be possible to change 9100 to 9550 or 9200/9250 (which are almost 10 times more popular)? We have only 125 subs with 9100 @hwbot, which indicates 9100 is relatevely rare card. Anyway, most likely I won't be benching 3d even if 9550 is allowed but that may become an entry ticket for many other ocers.

totally agree!

it's hard to find 9100 in Ukraine

i think use 9200/9550/9600 it's really good idea))

  • Author
On 4/11/2019 at 6:38 PM, Mr.Scott said:

Griff, do you think we can eliminate the video unless there is a discrepancy? I mean, your hardware limitations by themselves will limit your competition to only a handful of overclockers to start with, and we all know who each other is already. Do you really expect any foul play enough to warrant a vid right upfront?

I wanted to experience this kind of verification. It could only apply to the first 3 results. and give 1-3% tolerance.

  • Author
On 4/12/2019 at 5:15 AM, cbjaust said:

Even if i had or could obtain the necessary hardware at reasonable cost, I think the added hassle of futzing around with recording a video of every potential result would rule me out. A one off video to verify a result is one thing but making a video every run is just too much to ask.

you are right you could only request at the end with a tolerance of 3% as you use for other types of checks.

  • Author
On 4/12/2019 at 6:59 AM, TerraRaptor said:

@GRIFF, suggestion. Would it be possible to change 9100 to 9550 or 9200/9250 

I'm sorry, but the choice is made. And my mistake but we leave it in the respect of those who are already preparing for the competition.

Well, i still have 4 other submissions to prepare:) 

@all let's not sandbug this time?) The platform is not very popular so if we share our results in good time we may all know smth new and get results stronger than expected.

  • Author

the background will be available by today, at the latest by tomorrow morning. sorry for the delay.

  • Author
5 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:

good. Re-capped the only via-based board I have (VH6-II) and should be ready this week for 2D.

Nice board with 1mhz step.

8 hours ago, GRIFF said:

yep i see))
understand about 9200/9550)))
maybe, it's better to use 9100)
so waiting for wallpapers, and start)

  • Author
3 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:

will you take part in comp?

No for fairness. I will do the same bench in parallel to compare ourselves. So I don't feel out of it.

Edited by GRIFF

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...