June 27, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, Dr. Tesla said: That run has to be buggy. No way that the CPU makes up for the low GPU clocks So you're saying Coffee Lake is no more efficient than Sandy Bridge then? lol
June 27, 20205 yr Never said that! Just take a look at the scores uploaded by luumi, wizerty and sniperoz for comparison. This runs subtests 1-5 are war off but 6-9 are plausible...
June 27, 20205 yr aCTU 1 hour ago, Mr.Scott said: So you're saying Coffee Lake is no more efficient than Sandy Bridge then? lol I would say Coffee Lake is an overkill for G73, there should be no dramatic scaling from SB/IB. Aqua has some subtests that are being severely affected by excessive clock with G71/G73 (especially that blast in the end) and this score should be self-controlled by ShrimpBrime (with all the respect to this great man) - score is impossible with that card frequencies.
June 27, 20205 yr +1 to TerraRaptor. AquaMark3 on 7600GT doesn't benefit from CPU clocks above 5GHz even on SandyBridge, so it's extremely unlikely for a 5.3GHz Coffeelake to outweigh 350-400MHz GPU clockspeed deficit by nearly 30K in score.
June 27, 20205 yr Crew Scotty a 91K on GPU score, you can't even get that with eg a GTX285@900 and Shrimp gets it on a semi stock card with an inferior architecture... and his CPU score is the total opposite of what you claim it to be. C4 and C5 are clearly out of whack
June 29, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, Obijuan83 said: I cant find this submission, a link? Guess it was removed
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.