ShrimpBrime - GeForce 7600 GT PCIE GDDR3 @ 629/819MHz - 208097 marks Aquamark

[unityofsaints]

Nice!

[DanGilmore]

That run has to be buggy. No way that the CPU makes up for the low GPU clocks

[Mr.Scott]

4 hours ago, Dr. Tesla said:

That run has to be buggy. No way that the CPU makes up for the low GPU clocks

So you're saying Coffee Lake is no more efficient than Sandy Bridge then? lol

[DanGilmore]

Never said that! Just take a look at the scores uploaded by luumi, wizerty and sniperoz for comparison. This runs subtests 1-5 are war off but 6-9 are plausible...

[TerraRaptor]

aCTU

1 hour ago, Mr.Scott said:

So you're saying Coffee Lake is no more efficient than Sandy Bridge then? lol

I would say Coffee Lake is an overkill for G73, there should be no dramatic scaling from SB/IB. Aqua has some subtests that are being severely affected by excessive clock with G71/G73 (especially that blast in the end) and this score should be self-controlled by ShrimpBrime (with all the respect to this great man) - score is impossible with that card frequencies.

[TaPaKaH]

+1 to TerraRaptor. AquaMark3 on 7600GT doesn't benefit from CPU clocks above 5GHz even on SandyBridge, so it's extremely unlikely for a 5.3GHz Coffeelake to outweigh 350-400MHz GPU clockspeed deficit by nearly 30K in score.

[Leeghoofd]

Scotty a  91K on GPU score, you can't even get that with eg a GTX285@900 and Shrimp gets it on a semi stock card with an inferior architecture...  and his CPU score is the total opposite of what you claim it to be.

C4 and C5 are clearly out of whack

[Obijuan83]

I cant find this submission, a link?

[TerraRaptor]

1 hour ago, Obijuan83 said:

I cant find this submission, a link?

Guess it was removed